Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Disability, discourse and desire

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Disability, discourse and desire: analyzing online talk by people with disabilities

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Disability, discourse and desire: analyzing online talk by people with disabilities. / Hall, Matthew.
In: Sexualities, Vol. 21, No. 3, 01.03.2018, p. 379-392.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Hall M. Disability, discourse and desire: analyzing online talk by people with disabilities. Sexualities. 2018 Mar 1;21(3):379-392. Epub 2017 Apr 19. doi: 10.1177/1363460716688675

Author

Bibtex

@article{5ec80bb4b2314f4d8cf103c328f67f1d,
title = "Disability, discourse and desire: analyzing online talk by people with disabilities",
abstract = "Fran Vicary, who has had cerebral palsy from birth, recently claimed (The Guardian, February 20, 2014) most people with a disability seek to express themselves sexually. Arguing from personal experience, she said the expression of sexual desire is a much contested space for those with disabilities because their sexualities and bodies are controlled by broader public discourses that delegitimise and stigmatise their sexual agency and the possibility of pleasure. It isn{\textquoteright}t surprising then that positive and empowering discourses of disability and sexuality are either invisible or missing (Shildrick, 2007; Tepper, 2000). Drawing on discourse analysis (Potter, 1996) I examine electronic talk by people with disabilities in a disability specific online community website. My analysis shows their rejection of mainstream discourses positioning them as asexual and the deployment of mainstream discourses, which draw on gender, sexuality and intimacy, as well as the circulation of disability-specific sexual pleasure discourses with sex workers and caregivers. The use of social media in expressing marginalised sexual identities is also discussed.",
keywords = "disability, discourse analysis, sexual desires, sexual preferences, social media",
author = "Matthew Hall",
year = "2018",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1363460716688675",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "379--392",
journal = "Sexualities",
issn = "1363-4607",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disability, discourse and desire

T2 - analyzing online talk by people with disabilities

AU - Hall, Matthew

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Fran Vicary, who has had cerebral palsy from birth, recently claimed (The Guardian, February 20, 2014) most people with a disability seek to express themselves sexually. Arguing from personal experience, she said the expression of sexual desire is a much contested space for those with disabilities because their sexualities and bodies are controlled by broader public discourses that delegitimise and stigmatise their sexual agency and the possibility of pleasure. It isn’t surprising then that positive and empowering discourses of disability and sexuality are either invisible or missing (Shildrick, 2007; Tepper, 2000). Drawing on discourse analysis (Potter, 1996) I examine electronic talk by people with disabilities in a disability specific online community website. My analysis shows their rejection of mainstream discourses positioning them as asexual and the deployment of mainstream discourses, which draw on gender, sexuality and intimacy, as well as the circulation of disability-specific sexual pleasure discourses with sex workers and caregivers. The use of social media in expressing marginalised sexual identities is also discussed.

AB - Fran Vicary, who has had cerebral palsy from birth, recently claimed (The Guardian, February 20, 2014) most people with a disability seek to express themselves sexually. Arguing from personal experience, she said the expression of sexual desire is a much contested space for those with disabilities because their sexualities and bodies are controlled by broader public discourses that delegitimise and stigmatise their sexual agency and the possibility of pleasure. It isn’t surprising then that positive and empowering discourses of disability and sexuality are either invisible or missing (Shildrick, 2007; Tepper, 2000). Drawing on discourse analysis (Potter, 1996) I examine electronic talk by people with disabilities in a disability specific online community website. My analysis shows their rejection of mainstream discourses positioning them as asexual and the deployment of mainstream discourses, which draw on gender, sexuality and intimacy, as well as the circulation of disability-specific sexual pleasure discourses with sex workers and caregivers. The use of social media in expressing marginalised sexual identities is also discussed.

KW - disability

KW - discourse analysis

KW - sexual desires

KW - sexual preferences

KW - social media

U2 - 10.1177/1363460716688675

DO - 10.1177/1363460716688675

M3 - Journal article

VL - 21

SP - 379

EP - 392

JO - Sexualities

JF - Sexualities

SN - 1363-4607

IS - 3

ER -