Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Disabled people and digitalization

Electronic data

  • Disabled People and DigitalizationFinal

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Organization Studies, ? (?), 2019, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2019 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Organization Studies page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/OSS/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

    Accepted author manuscript, 556 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Disabled people and digitalization: Disruptive documents in distributing digital devices

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

E-pub ahead of print
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>12/09/2019
<mark>Journal</mark>Organization Studies
Number of pages18
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print
Early online date12/09/19
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

This article examines the selection process in a pilot project aimed at distributing computers to disabled people to allow for digitalization. Particular attention is paid to the complexities generated by an allocation assessment form, designed to help these people improve their social interactions through electronic media. There is a paucity of discussions on forms in the organization studies literature but, when studied, an over-reliance on semantics such that their enactment in embodied sociomaterial performances is easily glossed over. Our problematic revolves around how forms and their surrounding sociomaterial performances constitute, but are also transformed by, subjects, objects and organizational relations. The contribution of this article is, therefore, to address the embodied enactments and sociomaterial practices that are embedded within these allocation processes. So, for example, assessors in the project deviated from a strict interpretation of the questions on the form and sometimes ignored clients’ responses so as to prevent formal allocations of computers from being seen as illegitimate, and potentially disruptive to the organization’s objectives of distributing digital devices. This enabled us to focus on the sociomaterial and embodied relations that are enacted within the selection process and how these place limits on, but also possibilities for, those allocating and those seeking to be allocated computers. The case study shows how distributing computers to disabled people is a complex sociomaterial process that is conditioned by the embodied performances and textual devices deployed. At the same time, the process was informed by humanistic and normalizing assumptions about sociability that are inscribed on the assessment form as criteria for allocating the computers. One implication, we found, was a tendency to reinforce the marginalization of disabled people.

Bibliographic note

The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Organization Studies, ? (?), 2019, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2019 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Organization Studies page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/OSS/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/