Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Disciplining ‘problem parents’ in the youth court

Electronic data

  • S1474746409990224a

    Rights statement: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=SPS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Social Policy & Society, 9 (1), pp 89-99 2009, © 2009 Cambridge University Press.

    Final published version, 466 KB, PDF document

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Disciplining ‘problem parents’ in the youth court: between regulation and resistance

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Disciplining ‘problem parents’ in the youth court: between regulation and resistance. / Holt, Amanda .
In: Social Policy and Society, Vol. 9, No. 1, 01.2010, p. 89-99.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Holt A. Disciplining ‘problem parents’ in the youth court: between regulation and resistance. Social Policy and Society. 2010 Jan;9(1):89-99. doi: 10.1017/S1474746409990224

Author

Holt, Amanda . / Disciplining ‘problem parents’ in the youth court : between regulation and resistance. In: Social Policy and Society. 2010 ; Vol. 9, No. 1. pp. 89-99.

Bibtex

@article{c289b827bb6e486d865ddaa8e6fb5cad,
title = "Disciplining {\textquoteleft}problem parents{\textquoteright} in the youth court: between regulation and resistance",
abstract = "This paper explores the ways in which parents, who have been the recipients of Parenting Orders, perform identity work through their accounts of their experiences in court. Discourse analysis is used to identify five key {\textquoteleft}strategies of resistance{\textquoteright} through which parents manage their parental identity and argues that such discursive practices highlight the fragility of such parents' claims to a positive parental identity in light of hegemonic gendered and classed conceptions of {\textquoteleft}responsible parenting{\textquoteright}. The paper concludes by reflecting on what such practices might mean for parents who find themselves at once both regulated and resistant.",
author = "Amanda Holt",
note = "http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=SPS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Social Policy & Society, 9 (1), pp 89-99 2009, {\textcopyright} 2009 Cambridge University Press.",
year = "2010",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1017/S1474746409990224",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "89--99",
journal = "Social Policy and Society",
issn = "1475-3073",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disciplining ‘problem parents’ in the youth court

T2 - between regulation and resistance

AU - Holt, Amanda

N1 - http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=SPS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Social Policy & Society, 9 (1), pp 89-99 2009, © 2009 Cambridge University Press.

PY - 2010/1

Y1 - 2010/1

N2 - This paper explores the ways in which parents, who have been the recipients of Parenting Orders, perform identity work through their accounts of their experiences in court. Discourse analysis is used to identify five key ‘strategies of resistance’ through which parents manage their parental identity and argues that such discursive practices highlight the fragility of such parents' claims to a positive parental identity in light of hegemonic gendered and classed conceptions of ‘responsible parenting’. The paper concludes by reflecting on what such practices might mean for parents who find themselves at once both regulated and resistant.

AB - This paper explores the ways in which parents, who have been the recipients of Parenting Orders, perform identity work through their accounts of their experiences in court. Discourse analysis is used to identify five key ‘strategies of resistance’ through which parents manage their parental identity and argues that such discursive practices highlight the fragility of such parents' claims to a positive parental identity in light of hegemonic gendered and classed conceptions of ‘responsible parenting’. The paper concludes by reflecting on what such practices might mean for parents who find themselves at once both regulated and resistant.

U2 - 10.1017/S1474746409990224

DO - 10.1017/S1474746409990224

M3 - Journal article

VL - 9

SP - 89

EP - 99

JO - Social Policy and Society

JF - Social Policy and Society

SN - 1475-3073

IS - 1

ER -