Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Discrimination of animate and inanimate motion ...
View graph of relations

Discrimination of animate and inanimate motion in 9-month-old infants: an ERP study

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Discrimination of animate and inanimate motion in 9-month-old infants: an ERP study. / Kaduk, Katharina; Elsner, Birgit; Reid, Vincent.
In: Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, Vol. 6, 10.2013, p. 14-22.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Kaduk K, Elsner B, Reid V. Discrimination of animate and inanimate motion in 9-month-old infants: an ERP study. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 2013 Oct;6:14-22. Epub 2013 Jun 15. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2013.05.003

Author

Kaduk, Katharina ; Elsner, Birgit ; Reid, Vincent. / Discrimination of animate and inanimate motion in 9-month-old infants : an ERP study. In: Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. 2013 ; Vol. 6. pp. 14-22.

Bibtex

@article{b5b86b12ec3340f5aad4696e078588b4,
title = "Discrimination of animate and inanimate motion in 9-month-old infants: an ERP study",
abstract = "Simple geometric shapes moving in a self-propelled manner, and violating Newtonian laws of motion by acting against gravitational forces tend to induce a judgement that an object is animate. Objects that change their motion only due to external causes are more likely judged as inanimate. How the developing brain is employed in the perception of animacy in early ontogeny is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to use ERP techniques to determine if the negative central component (Nc), a waveform related to attention allocation, was differentially affected when an infant observed animate or inanimate motion. Short animated movies comprising a marble moving along a marble run either in an animate or an inanimate manner were presented to 15 infants who were 9 months of age. The ERPs were time-locked to a still frame representing animate or inanimate motion that was displayed following each movie. We found that 9-month-olds are able to discriminate between animate and inanimate motion based on motion cues alone and most likely allocate more attentional resources to the inanimate motion. The present data contribute to our understanding of the animate–inanimate distinction and the Nc as a correlate of infant cognitive processing.",
keywords = "Infant, EEG/ERP , Nc , Attention, Animacy",
author = "Katharina Kaduk and Birgit Elsner and Vincent Reid",
year = "2013",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1016/j.dcn.2013.05.003",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "14--22",
journal = "Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience",
issn = "1878-9307",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Discrimination of animate and inanimate motion in 9-month-old infants

T2 - an ERP study

AU - Kaduk, Katharina

AU - Elsner, Birgit

AU - Reid, Vincent

PY - 2013/10

Y1 - 2013/10

N2 - Simple geometric shapes moving in a self-propelled manner, and violating Newtonian laws of motion by acting against gravitational forces tend to induce a judgement that an object is animate. Objects that change their motion only due to external causes are more likely judged as inanimate. How the developing brain is employed in the perception of animacy in early ontogeny is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to use ERP techniques to determine if the negative central component (Nc), a waveform related to attention allocation, was differentially affected when an infant observed animate or inanimate motion. Short animated movies comprising a marble moving along a marble run either in an animate or an inanimate manner were presented to 15 infants who were 9 months of age. The ERPs were time-locked to a still frame representing animate or inanimate motion that was displayed following each movie. We found that 9-month-olds are able to discriminate between animate and inanimate motion based on motion cues alone and most likely allocate more attentional resources to the inanimate motion. The present data contribute to our understanding of the animate–inanimate distinction and the Nc as a correlate of infant cognitive processing.

AB - Simple geometric shapes moving in a self-propelled manner, and violating Newtonian laws of motion by acting against gravitational forces tend to induce a judgement that an object is animate. Objects that change their motion only due to external causes are more likely judged as inanimate. How the developing brain is employed in the perception of animacy in early ontogeny is currently unknown. The aim of this study was to use ERP techniques to determine if the negative central component (Nc), a waveform related to attention allocation, was differentially affected when an infant observed animate or inanimate motion. Short animated movies comprising a marble moving along a marble run either in an animate or an inanimate manner were presented to 15 infants who were 9 months of age. The ERPs were time-locked to a still frame representing animate or inanimate motion that was displayed following each movie. We found that 9-month-olds are able to discriminate between animate and inanimate motion based on motion cues alone and most likely allocate more attentional resources to the inanimate motion. The present data contribute to our understanding of the animate–inanimate distinction and the Nc as a correlate of infant cognitive processing.

KW - Infant

KW - EEG/ERP

KW - Nc

KW - Attention

KW - Animacy

U2 - 10.1016/j.dcn.2013.05.003

DO - 10.1016/j.dcn.2013.05.003

M3 - Journal article

VL - 6

SP - 14

EP - 22

JO - Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

JF - Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

SN - 1878-9307

ER -