Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Dispositional anger and the resolution of the a...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Dispositional anger and the resolution of the approach-avoidance conflict

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Dispositional anger and the resolution of the approach-avoidance conflict. / Robinson, Michael D.; Boyd, Ryan L.; Persich, Michelle R.
In: Emotion, Vol. 16, No. 6, 01.09.2016, p. 838-849.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Robinson MD, Boyd RL, Persich MR. Dispositional anger and the resolution of the approach-avoidance conflict. Emotion. 2016 Sept 1;16(6):838-849. Epub 2016 Apr 14. doi: 10.1037/emo0000189

Author

Robinson, Michael D. ; Boyd, Ryan L. ; Persich, Michelle R. / Dispositional anger and the resolution of the approach-avoidance conflict. In: Emotion. 2016 ; Vol. 16, No. 6. pp. 838-849.

Bibtex

@article{b6bfdeeeddbc4ae4bbec9da7b78e1b3c,
title = "Dispositional anger and the resolution of the approach-avoidance conflict",
abstract = "The approach-avoidance conflict is one in which approaching reward brings increased threat while avoiding threat means forgoing reward. This conflict can be uniquely informative because it will be resolved in different ways depending on whether approach (toward) or avoidance (away from) is the stronger motive. Two studies (total N = 191) created a computerized version of this conflict and used the test to examine questions of motivational direction in anger. In Study 1, noise blast provocations increased the frequency of approach behaviors at high levels of trait anger, but decreased their frequency at low levels. In Study 2, a simpler version of the conflict test was used to predict anger in daily life. As hypothesized, greater approach frequencies in the test predicted greater anger reactivity to daily provocations and frustrations. The discussion focuses on the utility of the approach-avoidance conflict test and on questions of motivational direction in anger.",
keywords = "Anger, Approach, Avoidance, Conflict, Motivation",
author = "Robinson, {Michael D.} and Boyd, {Ryan L.} and Persich, {Michelle R.}",
year = "2016",
month = sep,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/emo0000189",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "838--849",
journal = "Emotion",
issn = "1528-3542",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dispositional anger and the resolution of the approach-avoidance conflict

AU - Robinson, Michael D.

AU - Boyd, Ryan L.

AU - Persich, Michelle R.

PY - 2016/9/1

Y1 - 2016/9/1

N2 - The approach-avoidance conflict is one in which approaching reward brings increased threat while avoiding threat means forgoing reward. This conflict can be uniquely informative because it will be resolved in different ways depending on whether approach (toward) or avoidance (away from) is the stronger motive. Two studies (total N = 191) created a computerized version of this conflict and used the test to examine questions of motivational direction in anger. In Study 1, noise blast provocations increased the frequency of approach behaviors at high levels of trait anger, but decreased their frequency at low levels. In Study 2, a simpler version of the conflict test was used to predict anger in daily life. As hypothesized, greater approach frequencies in the test predicted greater anger reactivity to daily provocations and frustrations. The discussion focuses on the utility of the approach-avoidance conflict test and on questions of motivational direction in anger.

AB - The approach-avoidance conflict is one in which approaching reward brings increased threat while avoiding threat means forgoing reward. This conflict can be uniquely informative because it will be resolved in different ways depending on whether approach (toward) or avoidance (away from) is the stronger motive. Two studies (total N = 191) created a computerized version of this conflict and used the test to examine questions of motivational direction in anger. In Study 1, noise blast provocations increased the frequency of approach behaviors at high levels of trait anger, but decreased their frequency at low levels. In Study 2, a simpler version of the conflict test was used to predict anger in daily life. As hypothesized, greater approach frequencies in the test predicted greater anger reactivity to daily provocations and frustrations. The discussion focuses on the utility of the approach-avoidance conflict test and on questions of motivational direction in anger.

KW - Anger

KW - Approach

KW - Avoidance

KW - Conflict

KW - Motivation

U2 - 10.1037/emo0000189

DO - 10.1037/emo0000189

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 27078742

AN - SCOPUS:84962883611

VL - 16

SP - 838

EP - 849

JO - Emotion

JF - Emotion

SN - 1528-3542

IS - 6

ER -