Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Distinctiveness, typicality, and recollective e...
View graph of relations

Distinctiveness, typicality, and recollective experience in face recognition: A principal components analysis.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Distinctiveness, typicality, and recollective experience in face recognition: A principal components analysis. / Dewhurst, Stephen A.; Hay, Dennis C.; Wickham, Lee H. V.
In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, Vol. 12, No. 6, 01.01.2005, p. 1032-1037.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Dewhurst, Stephen A. ; Hay, Dennis C. ; Wickham, Lee H. V. / Distinctiveness, typicality, and recollective experience in face recognition: A principal components analysis. In: Psychonomic Bulletin and Review. 2005 ; Vol. 12, No. 6. pp. 1032-1037.

Bibtex

@article{c047cc03bdb940578af53f04b8d65d76,
title = "Distinctiveness, typicality, and recollective experience in face recognition: A principal components analysis.",
abstract = "In this study, participants rated previously unseen faces on six dimensions: familiarity, distinctiveness, attractiveness, memorability, typicality, and resemblance to a familiar person. The faces were then presented again in a recognition test in which participants assigned their positive recognition decisions to either remember (R), know (K), or guess categories. On all dimensions except typicality, faces that were categorized as R responses were associated with significantly higher ratings than were faces categorized as K responses. Study ratings for R and K responses were then subjected to a principal components analysis. The factor loadings suggested that R responses were influenced primarily by the distinctiveness of faces, but K responses were influenced by moderate ratings on all six dimensions. These findings indicate that the structural features of a face influence the subjective experience of recognition.",
author = "Dewhurst, {Stephen A.} and Hay, {Dennis C.} and Wickham, {Lee H. V.}",
note = "Hay supervised the data collection, conducted data analysis, and co-wrote the manuscript. RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Psychology",
year = "2005",
month = jan,
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
pages = "1032--1037",
journal = "Psychonomic Bulletin and Review",
issn = "1069-9384",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distinctiveness, typicality, and recollective experience in face recognition: A principal components analysis.

AU - Dewhurst, Stephen A.

AU - Hay, Dennis C.

AU - Wickham, Lee H. V.

N1 - Hay supervised the data collection, conducted data analysis, and co-wrote the manuscript. RAE_import_type : Journal article RAE_uoa_type : Psychology

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - In this study, participants rated previously unseen faces on six dimensions: familiarity, distinctiveness, attractiveness, memorability, typicality, and resemblance to a familiar person. The faces were then presented again in a recognition test in which participants assigned their positive recognition decisions to either remember (R), know (K), or guess categories. On all dimensions except typicality, faces that were categorized as R responses were associated with significantly higher ratings than were faces categorized as K responses. Study ratings for R and K responses were then subjected to a principal components analysis. The factor loadings suggested that R responses were influenced primarily by the distinctiveness of faces, but K responses were influenced by moderate ratings on all six dimensions. These findings indicate that the structural features of a face influence the subjective experience of recognition.

AB - In this study, participants rated previously unseen faces on six dimensions: familiarity, distinctiveness, attractiveness, memorability, typicality, and resemblance to a familiar person. The faces were then presented again in a recognition test in which participants assigned their positive recognition decisions to either remember (R), know (K), or guess categories. On all dimensions except typicality, faces that were categorized as R responses were associated with significantly higher ratings than were faces categorized as K responses. Study ratings for R and K responses were then subjected to a principal components analysis. The factor loadings suggested that R responses were influenced primarily by the distinctiveness of faces, but K responses were influenced by moderate ratings on all six dimensions. These findings indicate that the structural features of a face influence the subjective experience of recognition.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 12

SP - 1032

EP - 1037

JO - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

JF - Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

SN - 1069-9384

IS - 6

ER -