12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Divine Hoorays : Some Parallels Between Express...
View graph of relations

« Back

Divine Hoorays : Some Parallels Between Expressivism and Religious Ethics.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Journal publication date11/2006
JournalPhilosophy and Phenomenological Research
Journal number3
Volume77
Number of pages26
Pages659-684
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Divine law theories of metaethics claim that moral rightness is grounded in God�s commands, wishes and so forth. Expressivist theories, by contrast, claim that to call something morally right is to express our own attitudes, not to report on God�s. Ostensibly, such views are incompatible. However, we shall argue that a rapprochement is possible and beneficial to both sides. Expressivists need to explain the difference between reporting and expressing an attitude, and to address the Frege-Geach problem. Divine law theorists need to get past the Euthyphro dilemma, and to avoid moral externalism. This paper shows how a combined theory helps us to achieve this.

Bibliographic note

This is a pre-print of an article published in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 77 (3), 2008. (c) Wiley.