Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Do short break and respite services for familie...
View graph of relations

Do short break and respite services for families with a disabled child in England make a difference to siblings?: a qualitative analysis of sibling and parent responses

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Do short break and respite services for families with a disabled child in England make a difference to siblings? a qualitative analysis of sibling and parent responses. / Welch, Vicki; Hatton, Chris; Emerson, Eric et al.
In: Children and Youth Services Review, Vol. 34, No. 2, 02.2012, p. 451-459.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{e9aef6bce4a449a6899c46614b229830,
title = "Do short break and respite services for families with a disabled child in England make a difference to siblings?: a qualitative analysis of sibling and parent responses",
abstract = "Background: Previous research identifies positive and negative effects of being a sibling in a family which includes a disabled child. Short break services (also known as respite) provide families with a break from caring and offer disabled children the chance to participate in various activities. This paper investigates the effects that these short breaks have on siblings. Methods: The research consists of a qualitative analysis of data collected as part of a survey of families using short break services. Data from 239 parent-carers (mostly biological parents) and 84 siblings are included in the analysis. Data are written responses to open questions about use of services and the effects they have. Results: The effects of short breaks on siblings are described as being mostly positive. Short breaks have the potential to ameliorate some of the negative impacts of being a sibling in a family with a disabled child whilst also promoting the positive impacts of having a disabled brother or sister. However, some siblings also report some adverse effects of short breaks. Conclusion: Short breaks have a significant role to play in promoting the wellbeing of siblings; however, their role currently seems to be largely unrecognised and consequently undervalued.",
author = "Vicki Welch and Chris Hatton and Eric Emerson and Janet Robertson and Michelle Collins and Susanne Langer and Emma Wells",
year = "2012",
month = feb,
doi = "10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.12.002",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "451--459",
journal = "Children and Youth Services Review",
issn = "0190-7409",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do short break and respite services for families with a disabled child in England make a difference to siblings?

T2 - a qualitative analysis of sibling and parent responses

AU - Welch, Vicki

AU - Hatton, Chris

AU - Emerson, Eric

AU - Robertson, Janet

AU - Collins, Michelle

AU - Langer, Susanne

AU - Wells, Emma

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - Background: Previous research identifies positive and negative effects of being a sibling in a family which includes a disabled child. Short break services (also known as respite) provide families with a break from caring and offer disabled children the chance to participate in various activities. This paper investigates the effects that these short breaks have on siblings. Methods: The research consists of a qualitative analysis of data collected as part of a survey of families using short break services. Data from 239 parent-carers (mostly biological parents) and 84 siblings are included in the analysis. Data are written responses to open questions about use of services and the effects they have. Results: The effects of short breaks on siblings are described as being mostly positive. Short breaks have the potential to ameliorate some of the negative impacts of being a sibling in a family with a disabled child whilst also promoting the positive impacts of having a disabled brother or sister. However, some siblings also report some adverse effects of short breaks. Conclusion: Short breaks have a significant role to play in promoting the wellbeing of siblings; however, their role currently seems to be largely unrecognised and consequently undervalued.

AB - Background: Previous research identifies positive and negative effects of being a sibling in a family which includes a disabled child. Short break services (also known as respite) provide families with a break from caring and offer disabled children the chance to participate in various activities. This paper investigates the effects that these short breaks have on siblings. Methods: The research consists of a qualitative analysis of data collected as part of a survey of families using short break services. Data from 239 parent-carers (mostly biological parents) and 84 siblings are included in the analysis. Data are written responses to open questions about use of services and the effects they have. Results: The effects of short breaks on siblings are described as being mostly positive. Short breaks have the potential to ameliorate some of the negative impacts of being a sibling in a family with a disabled child whilst also promoting the positive impacts of having a disabled brother or sister. However, some siblings also report some adverse effects of short breaks. Conclusion: Short breaks have a significant role to play in promoting the wellbeing of siblings; however, their role currently seems to be largely unrecognised and consequently undervalued.

U2 - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.12.002

M3 - Journal article

VL - 34

SP - 451

EP - 459

JO - Children and Youth Services Review

JF - Children and Youth Services Review

SN - 0190-7409

IS - 2

ER -