Rights statement: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article:Campopiano, G., Brumana, M., Minola, T., and Cassia, L. ( 2019) Does Growth Represent Chimera or Bellerophon for a Family Business? The Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Family Influence Nuances. European Management Review 17 (3), https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12351 which has been published in final form at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/emre.12351 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.
Accepted author manuscript, 884 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Does Growth Represent Chimera or Bellerophon for a Family Business?
T2 - The Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Family Influence Nuances
AU - Campopiano, G.
AU - Brumana, M.
AU - Minola, T.
AU - Cassia, L.
N1 - This is the peer reviewed version of the following article:Campopiano, G., Brumana, M., Minola, T., and Cassia, L. ( 2019) Does Growth Represent Chimera or Bellerophon for a Family Business? The Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Family Influence Nuances. European Management Review 17 (3), https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.12351 which has been published in final form at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/emre.12351 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.
PY - 2020/11/25
Y1 - 2020/11/25
N2 - Growth brings lifeblood to sustain longevity across generation, but also critical challenges for family business. Relying on the behavioral agency model and its assumptions on risk-bearing in family firms, we discuss and test the effect of family involvement in the top management team (TMT) on family business growth. We use an input-behavior-outcome framework based on the mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation. We also consider the moderating role of different ownership structures on the relationship between family involvement in the TMT on entrepreneurial orientation (EO). Results based on survey data collected by the STEP research consortium support the hypothesized negative effect of family involvement in the TMT on growth, fully mediated by EO. We also find that the presence of passive family members as majority shareholders and multigenerational involvement in ownership are important contingencies of the direct effect. Our evidence points to the fact that risk-bearing in family firms is not just dependent on the degree of family involvement in management, but also on the interests of different types of shareholders. We show that the at-times stylized negative traits of family firms are not universally valid, and that a comprehensive view of family influence over the business is needed to ascertain whether and to what extent these firms actually achieve growth. © 2019 European Academy of Management
AB - Growth brings lifeblood to sustain longevity across generation, but also critical challenges for family business. Relying on the behavioral agency model and its assumptions on risk-bearing in family firms, we discuss and test the effect of family involvement in the top management team (TMT) on family business growth. We use an input-behavior-outcome framework based on the mediating role of entrepreneurial orientation. We also consider the moderating role of different ownership structures on the relationship between family involvement in the TMT on entrepreneurial orientation (EO). Results based on survey data collected by the STEP research consortium support the hypothesized negative effect of family involvement in the TMT on growth, fully mediated by EO. We also find that the presence of passive family members as majority shareholders and multigenerational involvement in ownership are important contingencies of the direct effect. Our evidence points to the fact that risk-bearing in family firms is not just dependent on the degree of family involvement in management, but also on the interests of different types of shareholders. We show that the at-times stylized negative traits of family firms are not universally valid, and that a comprehensive view of family influence over the business is needed to ascertain whether and to what extent these firms actually achieve growth. © 2019 European Academy of Management
KW - behavioral agency model
KW - entrepreneurial orientation
KW - Family business
KW - growth
KW - risk-bearing
U2 - 10.1111/emre.12351
DO - 10.1111/emre.12351
M3 - Journal article
VL - 17
SP - 765
EP - 783
JO - European Management Review
JF - European Management Review
SN - 1740-4754
IS - 3
ER -