Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Doing and undoing gender in innovation

Electronic data

  • Doing_and_undoing_gender_in_innovation_Femininities_and_masculinities_in_innovation_processes

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Human Relations, 69 (11), 2016, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2016 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Human Relations page: http://hum.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/

    Accepted author manuscript, 217 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Doing and undoing gender in innovation: femininities and masculinities in innovation processes

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>11/2016
<mark>Journal</mark>Human Relations
Issue number11
Volume69
Number of pages24
Pages (from-to)2117-2140
Publication statusPublished
Early online date26/04/16
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Despite the rising interest in the intertwining of individuals, organisations and institutions in innovation research, scant attention has been paid to the ways that their relations produce and reproduce specific gender dynamics throughout the innovation process. Innovation research has been characterised by a gender blindness that conceals the gendered nature of innovation processes. This article draws on the material collected through an ethnographic investigation conducted in two research organisations to illustrate how innovation processes are gendered when specific forms of masculinities and femininities are constructed, enacted and resisted by men and women. This article contributes towards developing a gendered understanding of innovation by introducing the term ‘positions of displacement’ to signal the fluidity and messiness of doings and undoings of femininities and masculinities through innovation practices.

Bibliographic note

The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Human Relations, 69 (11), 2016, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2016 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Human Relations page: http://hum.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/