Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Doing good online

Electronic data

  • cox-et-al-2015-doing-good-online

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.37 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Doing good online: the changing relationships between motivations, activity, and retention among online volunteers

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
  • Joe Cox
  • Eun Young Oh
  • Brooke Simmons
  • Gary Graham
  • Anita Greenhill
  • Chris Lintott
  • Karen Masters
  • Jamie Woodcock
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/10/2018
<mark>Journal</mark>Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
Issue number5
Volume47
Number of pages26
Pages (from-to)1031-1056
Publication StatusPublished
<mark>Original language</mark>English
Externally publishedYes

Abstract

Advances in Internet technology are making it possible for individuals to volunteer online and participate in research-based activities of nonprofit organizations. Using survey data from a representative sample of such contributors, this study investigates their motivations to volunteer for five online volunteering projects using the Volunteer Functions Inventory. We explore relationships between these six categories of motivation and actual recorded measures of both volunteer activity and retention. We also use quantile regression analysis to investigate the extent to which these motivations change at different stages in the volunteer process. Our results show that volunteers’ activity and retention tend to associate significantly and positively with the motivations of understanding and values, as well as significantly and negatively with the social and career motivations. We also find the importance of motivations changes significantly across the stages of volunteer engagement. In some cases, especially the understanding motivation, the changes observed for activity and retention are markedly different.

Bibliographic note

The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 47 (5), 2018, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2018 by SAGE Publications Ltd