Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Dominant native and non-native graminoids diffe...

Electronic data

  • Broadbent et al 2020 GEB Pre_typesetting

    Rights statement: This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Broadbent, AAD, Firn, J, McGree, JM, et al. Dominant native and non‐native graminoids differ in key leaf traits irrespective of nutrient availability. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2020; 29: 1126– 1138. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13092 which has been published in final form at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/geb.13092 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

    Accepted author manuscript, 1.48 MB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 12/03/21

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Dominant native and non-native graminoids differ in key leaf traits irrespective of nutrient availability

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
  • J. Firn
  • J.M. McGree
  • E.T. Borer
  • Y.M. Buckley
  • W.S. Harpole
  • K.J. Komatsu
  • A.S. MacDougall
  • E.W. Seabloom
  • J.D. Bakker
  • L. Biederman
  • M.C. Caldeira
  • N. Eisenhauer
  • N. Hagenah
  • Y. Hautier
  • J.L. Moore
  • C. Nogueira
  • P.L. Peri
  • A.C. Risch
  • C. Roscher
  • M. Schütz
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/07/2020
<mark>Journal</mark>Global Ecology and Biogeography
Issue number7
Volume29
Number of pages13
Pages (from-to)1126-1138
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date12/03/20
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Aim: Nutrient enrichment is associated with plant invasions and biodiversity loss. Functional trait advantages may predict the ascendancy of invasive plants following nutrient enrichment but this is rarely tested. Here, we investigate (a) whether dominant native and non-native plants differ in important morphological and physiological leaf traits, (b) how their traits respond to nutrient addition, and (c) whether responses are consistent across functional groups. Location: Australia, Europe, North America and South Africa. Time period: 2007–2014. Major taxa studied: Graminoids and forbs. Methods: We focused on two types of leaf traits connected to resource acquisition: morphological features relating to light-foraging surfaces and investment in tissue (specific leaf area, SLA) and physiological features relating to internal leaf chemistry as the basis for producing and utilizing photosynthate. We measured these traits on 503 leaves from 151 dominant species across 27 grasslands on four continents. We used an identical nutrient addition treatment of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) at all sites. Sites represented a broad range of grasslands that varied widely in climatic and edaphic conditions. Results: We found evidence that non-native graminoids invest in leaves with higher nutrient concentrations than native graminoids, particularly at sites where native and non-native species both dominate. We found little evidence that native and non-native forbs differed in the measured leaf traits. These results were consistent in natural soil fertility levels and nutrient-enriched conditions, with dominant species responding similarly to nutrient addition regardless of whether they were native or non-native. Main conclusions: Our work identifies the inherent physiological trait advantages that can be used to predict non-native graminoid establishment, potentially because of higher efficiency at taking up crucial nutrients into their leaves. Most importantly, these inherent advantages are already present at natural soil fertility levels and are maintained following nutrient enrichment.

Bibliographic note

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Broadbent, AAD, Firn, J, McGree, JM, et al. Dominant native and non‐native graminoids differ in key leaf traits irrespective of nutrient availability. Global Ecol Biogeogr. 2020; 29: 1126– 1138. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13092 which has been published in final form at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/geb.13092 This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.