Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Drs Bramhall and Bawa-Garba and the Rightful Do...

Electronic data

  • Drs_Bramhall_and_Bawa_Garba_and_the_Rightful_Domain_of_the_Criminal_Law_R1 (1)

    Accepted author manuscript, 554 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 1/01/50

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Drs Bramhall and Bawa-Garba and the Rightful Domain of the Criminal Law

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Drs Bramhall and Bawa-Garba and the Rightful Domain of the Criminal Law. / Ost, Suzanne.

In: Journal of Medical Ethics, Vol. 49, No. 3, 23.12.2018, p. 151-155.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Ost, Suzanne. / Drs Bramhall and Bawa-Garba and the Rightful Domain of the Criminal Law. In: Journal of Medical Ethics. 2018 ; Vol. 49, No. 3. pp. 151-155.

Bibtex

@article{35916556cb7b4ec5b9e5aa2e5a5a30ab,
title = "Drs Bramhall and Bawa-Garba and the Rightful Domain of the Criminal Law",
abstract = "In the wake of two recent high-profile, controversial cases involving the prosecution and conviction of Drs Bramhall and Bawa-Garba, this article considers when it is socially desirable to criminalise doctors’ behaviour, exploring how the matters of harm, public wrongs and the public interest can play out to justify – or not, as the case may be - the criminal law’s intervention. Dr Bramhall branded his initials on patients’ livers during transplant surgery, behaviour acknowledged not to have caused his patients any harm by way of injury to their organs. Dr Bawa-Garba misdiagnosed and failed to properly assess a six-year-old boy with pneumonia and sepsis under her care, who subsequently died. Taking account of contextual and public interest concerns, can and should there be exceptions to imposing criminal liability where a doctor’s behaviour is deemed grossly negligent and a significant contribution to a patient’s death? And is it really appropriate to subject a doctor to penal sanction where he may have committed a private wrong against a patient, but does not set back their interests?",
keywords = "criminal law, criminalising doctors, harm, public wrongs, systemic failings",
author = "Suzanne Ost",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1136/medethics-2018-105135",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "151--155",
journal = "Journal of Medical Ethics",
issn = "0306-6800",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Drs Bramhall and Bawa-Garba and the Rightful Domain of the Criminal Law

AU - Ost, Suzanne

PY - 2018/12/23

Y1 - 2018/12/23

N2 - In the wake of two recent high-profile, controversial cases involving the prosecution and conviction of Drs Bramhall and Bawa-Garba, this article considers when it is socially desirable to criminalise doctors’ behaviour, exploring how the matters of harm, public wrongs and the public interest can play out to justify – or not, as the case may be - the criminal law’s intervention. Dr Bramhall branded his initials on patients’ livers during transplant surgery, behaviour acknowledged not to have caused his patients any harm by way of injury to their organs. Dr Bawa-Garba misdiagnosed and failed to properly assess a six-year-old boy with pneumonia and sepsis under her care, who subsequently died. Taking account of contextual and public interest concerns, can and should there be exceptions to imposing criminal liability where a doctor’s behaviour is deemed grossly negligent and a significant contribution to a patient’s death? And is it really appropriate to subject a doctor to penal sanction where he may have committed a private wrong against a patient, but does not set back their interests?

AB - In the wake of two recent high-profile, controversial cases involving the prosecution and conviction of Drs Bramhall and Bawa-Garba, this article considers when it is socially desirable to criminalise doctors’ behaviour, exploring how the matters of harm, public wrongs and the public interest can play out to justify – or not, as the case may be - the criminal law’s intervention. Dr Bramhall branded his initials on patients’ livers during transplant surgery, behaviour acknowledged not to have caused his patients any harm by way of injury to their organs. Dr Bawa-Garba misdiagnosed and failed to properly assess a six-year-old boy with pneumonia and sepsis under her care, who subsequently died. Taking account of contextual and public interest concerns, can and should there be exceptions to imposing criminal liability where a doctor’s behaviour is deemed grossly negligent and a significant contribution to a patient’s death? And is it really appropriate to subject a doctor to penal sanction where he may have committed a private wrong against a patient, but does not set back their interests?

KW - criminal law

KW - criminalising doctors

KW - harm

KW - public wrongs

KW - systemic failings

UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2018-105135

U2 - 10.1136/medethics-2018-105135

DO - 10.1136/medethics-2018-105135

M3 - Journal article

VL - 49

SP - 151

EP - 155

JO - Journal of Medical Ethics

JF - Journal of Medical Ethics

SN - 0306-6800

IS - 3

ER -