Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Dynamic monitors of brain function

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Dynamic monitors of brain function: a new target in neurointensive care unit

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Dynamic monitors of brain function: a new target in neurointensive care unit. / Bosco, Enrico; Marton, Elisabetta; Feletti, Alberto et al.
In: Critical Care, Vol. 15, R170, 15.07.2011.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Bosco, E, Marton, E, Feletti, A, Scarpa, B, Longatti, P, Zanatta, P, Giorgi, E & Sorbara, C 2011, 'Dynamic monitors of brain function: a new target in neurointensive care unit', Critical Care, vol. 15, R170. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10315

APA

Bosco, E., Marton, E., Feletti, A., Scarpa, B., Longatti, P., Zanatta, P., Giorgi, E., & Sorbara, C. (2011). Dynamic monitors of brain function: a new target in neurointensive care unit. Critical Care, 15, Article R170. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc10315

Vancouver

Bosco E, Marton E, Feletti A, Scarpa B, Longatti P, Zanatta P et al. Dynamic monitors of brain function: a new target in neurointensive care unit. Critical Care. 2011 Jul 15;15:R170. doi: 10.1186/cc10315

Author

Bosco, Enrico ; Marton, Elisabetta ; Feletti, Alberto et al. / Dynamic monitors of brain function : a new target in neurointensive care unit. In: Critical Care. 2011 ; Vol. 15.

Bibtex

@article{de37bb1b886746149331c5cfe050d8c4,
title = "Dynamic monitors of brain function: a new target in neurointensive care unit",
abstract = "IntroductionSomatosensory evoked potential (SEP) recordings and continuous electroencephalography (EEG) are important tools with which to predict Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores. Their combined use may potentially allow for early detection of neurological impairment and more effective treatment of clinical deterioration.MethodsWe followed up 68 selected comatose patients between 2007 and 2009 who had been admitted to the Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit of Treviso Hospital after being diagnosed with subarachnoid haemorrhage (51 cases) or intracerebral haemorrhage (17 cases). Quantitative brain function monitoring was carried out using a remote EEG-SEP recording system connected to a small amplification head box with 28 channels and a multimodal stimulator (NEMO; EBNeuro, Italy NeMus 2; EBNeuro S.p.A., Via P. Fanfani 97/A - 50127 Firenze, Italy). For statistical analysis, we fit a binary logistic regression model to estimate the effect of brain function monitoring on the probability of GOS scores equal to 1. We also designed a proportional odds model for GOS scores, depending on amplitude and changes in both SEPs and EEG as well as on the joint effect of other related variables. Both families of models, logistic regression analysis and proportional odds ratios, were fit by using a maximum likelihood test and the partial effect of each variable was assessed by using a likelihood ratio test.ResultsUsing the logistic regression model, we observed that progressive deterioration on the basis of EEG was associated with an increased risk of dying by almost 24% compared to patients whose condition did not worsen according to EEG. SEP decreases were also significant; for patients with worsening SEPs, the odds of dying increased to approximately 32%. In the proportional odds model, only modifications of Modified Glasgow Coma Scale scores and SEPs during hospitalisation statistically significantly predicted GOS scores. Patients whose SEPs worsened during the last time interval had an approximately 17 times greater probability of a poor GOS score compared to the other patients.ConclusionsThe combined use of SEPs and continuous EEG monitoring is a unique example of dynamic brain monitoring. The temporal variation of these two parameters evaluated by continuous monitoring can establish whether the treatments used for patients receiving neurocritical care are properly tailored to the neurological changes induced by the lesions responsible for secondary damage.",
keywords = "somatosensory evoked potentials, electroencephalographic monitoring, dynamic brain monitoring, brain function monitoring",
author = "Enrico Bosco and Elisabetta Marton and Alberto Feletti and Bruno Scarpa and Pierluigi Longatti and Paolo Zanatta and Emanuele Giorgi and Carla Sorbara",
year = "2011",
month = jul,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1186/cc10315",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
journal = "Critical Care",
issn = "1364-8535",
publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dynamic monitors of brain function

T2 - a new target in neurointensive care unit

AU - Bosco, Enrico

AU - Marton, Elisabetta

AU - Feletti, Alberto

AU - Scarpa, Bruno

AU - Longatti, Pierluigi

AU - Zanatta, Paolo

AU - Giorgi, Emanuele

AU - Sorbara, Carla

PY - 2011/7/15

Y1 - 2011/7/15

N2 - IntroductionSomatosensory evoked potential (SEP) recordings and continuous electroencephalography (EEG) are important tools with which to predict Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores. Their combined use may potentially allow for early detection of neurological impairment and more effective treatment of clinical deterioration.MethodsWe followed up 68 selected comatose patients between 2007 and 2009 who had been admitted to the Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit of Treviso Hospital after being diagnosed with subarachnoid haemorrhage (51 cases) or intracerebral haemorrhage (17 cases). Quantitative brain function monitoring was carried out using a remote EEG-SEP recording system connected to a small amplification head box with 28 channels and a multimodal stimulator (NEMO; EBNeuro, Italy NeMus 2; EBNeuro S.p.A., Via P. Fanfani 97/A - 50127 Firenze, Italy). For statistical analysis, we fit a binary logistic regression model to estimate the effect of brain function monitoring on the probability of GOS scores equal to 1. We also designed a proportional odds model for GOS scores, depending on amplitude and changes in both SEPs and EEG as well as on the joint effect of other related variables. Both families of models, logistic regression analysis and proportional odds ratios, were fit by using a maximum likelihood test and the partial effect of each variable was assessed by using a likelihood ratio test.ResultsUsing the logistic regression model, we observed that progressive deterioration on the basis of EEG was associated with an increased risk of dying by almost 24% compared to patients whose condition did not worsen according to EEG. SEP decreases were also significant; for patients with worsening SEPs, the odds of dying increased to approximately 32%. In the proportional odds model, only modifications of Modified Glasgow Coma Scale scores and SEPs during hospitalisation statistically significantly predicted GOS scores. Patients whose SEPs worsened during the last time interval had an approximately 17 times greater probability of a poor GOS score compared to the other patients.ConclusionsThe combined use of SEPs and continuous EEG monitoring is a unique example of dynamic brain monitoring. The temporal variation of these two parameters evaluated by continuous monitoring can establish whether the treatments used for patients receiving neurocritical care are properly tailored to the neurological changes induced by the lesions responsible for secondary damage.

AB - IntroductionSomatosensory evoked potential (SEP) recordings and continuous electroencephalography (EEG) are important tools with which to predict Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores. Their combined use may potentially allow for early detection of neurological impairment and more effective treatment of clinical deterioration.MethodsWe followed up 68 selected comatose patients between 2007 and 2009 who had been admitted to the Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit of Treviso Hospital after being diagnosed with subarachnoid haemorrhage (51 cases) or intracerebral haemorrhage (17 cases). Quantitative brain function monitoring was carried out using a remote EEG-SEP recording system connected to a small amplification head box with 28 channels and a multimodal stimulator (NEMO; EBNeuro, Italy NeMus 2; EBNeuro S.p.A., Via P. Fanfani 97/A - 50127 Firenze, Italy). For statistical analysis, we fit a binary logistic regression model to estimate the effect of brain function monitoring on the probability of GOS scores equal to 1. We also designed a proportional odds model for GOS scores, depending on amplitude and changes in both SEPs and EEG as well as on the joint effect of other related variables. Both families of models, logistic regression analysis and proportional odds ratios, were fit by using a maximum likelihood test and the partial effect of each variable was assessed by using a likelihood ratio test.ResultsUsing the logistic regression model, we observed that progressive deterioration on the basis of EEG was associated with an increased risk of dying by almost 24% compared to patients whose condition did not worsen according to EEG. SEP decreases were also significant; for patients with worsening SEPs, the odds of dying increased to approximately 32%. In the proportional odds model, only modifications of Modified Glasgow Coma Scale scores and SEPs during hospitalisation statistically significantly predicted GOS scores. Patients whose SEPs worsened during the last time interval had an approximately 17 times greater probability of a poor GOS score compared to the other patients.ConclusionsThe combined use of SEPs and continuous EEG monitoring is a unique example of dynamic brain monitoring. The temporal variation of these two parameters evaluated by continuous monitoring can establish whether the treatments used for patients receiving neurocritical care are properly tailored to the neurological changes induced by the lesions responsible for secondary damage.

KW - somatosensory evoked potentials

KW - electroencephalographic monitoring

KW - dynamic brain monitoring

KW - brain function monitoring

U2 - 10.1186/cc10315

DO - 10.1186/cc10315

M3 - Journal article

VL - 15

JO - Critical Care

JF - Critical Care

SN - 1364-8535

M1 - R170

ER -