Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Leiden Journal of International Law, 32 (1), pp 71-89 2004, © 2019 Cambridge University Press
Accepted author manuscript, 987 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Ebola and the Airplane – Securing Mobility Through Regime Interactions And Legal Adaptation
AU - O Cuinn, Gearoid Micheal
AU - Switzer, Stephanie
N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Leiden Journal of International Law, 32 (1), pp 71-89 2004, © 2019 Cambridge University Press
PY - 2019/3/1
Y1 - 2019/3/1
N2 - This article concentrates on a particular controversy during the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa; the mass cancellation of flights to and from affected countries. This occurred despite authoritative advice against such restrictions from the World Health Organisation (WHO). During a public health emergency such as Ebola, the airplane sits at a site of regulatory uncertainty as it falls within the scope of two specialist and overlapping domains of international law; the WHO International Health Regulations (2005) and the Convention on International Civil Aviation. We explore how legal technicalities and objects, by promoting functional interactions between these two specialised regimes of law, were utilised to deal with this uncertainty. We show how the form and function of these mundane tools had a significant impact; assimilating aviation further into the system of global health security as well as instrumentalising the aircraft as a tool of disease surveillance. This encounter of regimes was law creating, resulting in new international protocols and standards designed to enable the resumption of flights in and out of countries affected by outbreaks. This article therefore offers significant and original insights into the hidden work performed by legal techniques and tools in dealing with regime overlap. Our findings contribute to the wider international law literature on fragmentation and enrich our understanding of the significance of relational regime interactions in international law.
AB - This article concentrates on a particular controversy during the 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa; the mass cancellation of flights to and from affected countries. This occurred despite authoritative advice against such restrictions from the World Health Organisation (WHO). During a public health emergency such as Ebola, the airplane sits at a site of regulatory uncertainty as it falls within the scope of two specialist and overlapping domains of international law; the WHO International Health Regulations (2005) and the Convention on International Civil Aviation. We explore how legal technicalities and objects, by promoting functional interactions between these two specialised regimes of law, were utilised to deal with this uncertainty. We show how the form and function of these mundane tools had a significant impact; assimilating aviation further into the system of global health security as well as instrumentalising the aircraft as a tool of disease surveillance. This encounter of regimes was law creating, resulting in new international protocols and standards designed to enable the resumption of flights in and out of countries affected by outbreaks. This article therefore offers significant and original insights into the hidden work performed by legal techniques and tools in dealing with regime overlap. Our findings contribute to the wider international law literature on fragmentation and enrich our understanding of the significance of relational regime interactions in international law.
KW - Ebola
KW - regime interactions
KW - WHO
KW - ICAO
KW - IHR
KW - global health
U2 - 10.1017/S0922156518000547
DO - 10.1017/S0922156518000547
M3 - Journal article
VL - 32
SP - 71
EP - 89
JO - Leiden Journal of International Law
JF - Leiden Journal of International Law
SN - 0922-1565
IS - 1
ER -