Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Economic geographies of power

Electronic data

  • Economic geographies of power Final

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Progress in Human Geography, 36 (6), 2012, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2012 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Progress in Human Geography page: http://phg.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/

    Submitted manuscript, 430 KB, PDF document

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Economic geographies of power: methodological challenges and interdisciplinary analytical possibilities

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Economic geographies of power: methodological challenges and interdisciplinary analytical possibilities. / Faulconbridge, James.
In: Progress in Human Geography, Vol. 36, No. 6, 12.2012, p. 734-756.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Faulconbridge J. Economic geographies of power: methodological challenges and interdisciplinary analytical possibilities. Progress in Human Geography. 2012 Dec;36(6):734-756. Epub 2012 Mar 8. doi: 10.1177/0309132512437075

Author

Bibtex

@article{0c500c9a643a4bd5aa39babb1f60b45f,
title = "Economic geographies of power: methodological challenges and interdisciplinary analytical possibilities",
abstract = "How can the modalities and whereabouts of power – and specifically the spatio-temporal contingencies and reach of power relations - be more effectively studied? This paper shows how issues of validity and reflexivity restrict existing empirical work{\textquoteright}s ability to advance understandings of power, and demonstrates how such issues can be overcome through the refined use of methods and analytical techniques that tease out the double contingencies of the social relations that underlie power. Refinements are shown to be possible by learning, in particular, from approaches to analysing power elsewhere in the social sciences, and particularly from management studies and linguistics. ",
keywords = "power, economic geography, relational",
author = "James Faulconbridge",
note = "The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Progress in Human Geography, 36 (6), 2012, {\textcopyright} SAGE Publications Ltd, 2012 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Progress in Human Geography page: http://phg.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/",
year = "2012",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1177/0309132512437075",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "734--756",
journal = "Progress in Human Geography",
issn = "0309-1325",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic geographies of power

T2 - methodological challenges and interdisciplinary analytical possibilities

AU - Faulconbridge, James

N1 - The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Progress in Human Geography, 36 (6), 2012, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2012 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Progress in Human Geography page: http://phg.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - How can the modalities and whereabouts of power – and specifically the spatio-temporal contingencies and reach of power relations - be more effectively studied? This paper shows how issues of validity and reflexivity restrict existing empirical work’s ability to advance understandings of power, and demonstrates how such issues can be overcome through the refined use of methods and analytical techniques that tease out the double contingencies of the social relations that underlie power. Refinements are shown to be possible by learning, in particular, from approaches to analysing power elsewhere in the social sciences, and particularly from management studies and linguistics.

AB - How can the modalities and whereabouts of power – and specifically the spatio-temporal contingencies and reach of power relations - be more effectively studied? This paper shows how issues of validity and reflexivity restrict existing empirical work’s ability to advance understandings of power, and demonstrates how such issues can be overcome through the refined use of methods and analytical techniques that tease out the double contingencies of the social relations that underlie power. Refinements are shown to be possible by learning, in particular, from approaches to analysing power elsewhere in the social sciences, and particularly from management studies and linguistics.

KW - power

KW - economic geography

KW - relational

U2 - 10.1177/0309132512437075

DO - 10.1177/0309132512437075

M3 - Journal article

VL - 36

SP - 734

EP - 756

JO - Progress in Human Geography

JF - Progress in Human Geography

SN - 0309-1325

IS - 6

ER -