Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Educating the design stance

Research

Electronic data

  • S0140525X12001616a

    Rights statement: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BBS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36 (2), pp 141-142 2013, © 2013 Cambridge University Press.

    Final published version, 1.25 MB, PDF document

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Educating the design stance: issues of coherence and transgression

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>04/2013
<mark>Journal</mark>Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Issue number2
Volume36
Number of pages2
Pages (from-to)141-142
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date18/03/13
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

Bullot & Reber (B&R) put forth a design stance to fuse psychological and art historical accounts of visual thinking into a single theory. We argue that this aspect of their proposal needs further fine-tuning. Issues of transgression and coherence are necessary to provide stability to the design stance. We advocate looking to Art Education for such fundamentals of picture understanding.

Bibliographic note

http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=BBS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36 (2), pp 141-142 2013, © 2013 Cambridge University Press.