Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Eight good questions for developmental epistemo...

Research

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Eight good questions for developmental epistemology and psychology

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Eight good questions for developmental epistemology and psychology. / Smith, Leslie.
In: New Ideas in Psychology, Vol. 17, No. 2, 08.1999, p. 137-147.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Smith, L 1999, 'Eight good questions for developmental epistemology and psychology', New Ideas in Psychology, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-118X(99)00016-1

APA

Smith, L. (1999). Eight good questions for developmental epistemology and psychology. New Ideas in Psychology, 17(2), 137-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-118X(99)00016-1

Vancouver

Smith L. Eight good questions for developmental epistemology and psychology. New Ideas in Psychology. 1999 Aug;17(2):137-147. doi: 10.1016/S0732-118X(99)00016-1

Author

Smith, Leslie. / Eight good questions for developmental epistemology and psychology. In: New Ideas in Psychology. 1999 ; Vol. 17, No. 2. pp. 137-147.

Bibtex

@article{3ad75c1fd45d4b0e898f9a485bb66cec,
title = "Eight good questions for developmental epistemology and psychology",
abstract = "My reply to eight good questions arising from commentary is an elaboration of my main argument that there are parallels in the epistemologies of Frege and Piaget and that these parallels have distinctive implications for developmental psychology. The eight questions are: (i) was Piaget really an epistemologist? (ii) is Piaget's epistemic subject psychological or epistemological? (iii) is Frege's non-modal logic consistent with Piaget's account of necessity? (iv) does Piaget's constructivism entail realism? (v) what is the relation between thinking and thought? (vi) is Frege's concept of mind too narrow? (vii) how are cause and reason related in the interpretation of thought? (viii) what is the status of an act of judgment in the interpretation of thought? These questions are productive: and can be developed. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.",
author = "Leslie Smith",
year = "1999",
month = aug,
doi = "10.1016/S0732-118X(99)00016-1",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "137--147",
journal = "New Ideas in Psychology",
issn = "0732-118X",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Eight good questions for developmental epistemology and psychology

AU - Smith, Leslie

PY - 1999/8

Y1 - 1999/8

N2 - My reply to eight good questions arising from commentary is an elaboration of my main argument that there are parallels in the epistemologies of Frege and Piaget and that these parallels have distinctive implications for developmental psychology. The eight questions are: (i) was Piaget really an epistemologist? (ii) is Piaget's epistemic subject psychological or epistemological? (iii) is Frege's non-modal logic consistent with Piaget's account of necessity? (iv) does Piaget's constructivism entail realism? (v) what is the relation between thinking and thought? (vi) is Frege's concept of mind too narrow? (vii) how are cause and reason related in the interpretation of thought? (viii) what is the status of an act of judgment in the interpretation of thought? These questions are productive: and can be developed. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

AB - My reply to eight good questions arising from commentary is an elaboration of my main argument that there are parallels in the epistemologies of Frege and Piaget and that these parallels have distinctive implications for developmental psychology. The eight questions are: (i) was Piaget really an epistemologist? (ii) is Piaget's epistemic subject psychological or epistemological? (iii) is Frege's non-modal logic consistent with Piaget's account of necessity? (iv) does Piaget's constructivism entail realism? (v) what is the relation between thinking and thought? (vi) is Frege's concept of mind too narrow? (vii) how are cause and reason related in the interpretation of thought? (viii) what is the status of an act of judgment in the interpretation of thought? These questions are productive: and can be developed. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

U2 - 10.1016/S0732-118X(99)00016-1

DO - 10.1016/S0732-118X(99)00016-1

M3 - Journal article

VL - 17

SP - 137

EP - 147

JO - New Ideas in Psychology

JF - New Ideas in Psychology

SN - 0732-118X

IS - 2

ER -