Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Enhanced relapse prevention for bipolar disorder
View graph of relations

Enhanced relapse prevention for bipolar disorder: a qualitative investigation of value perceived for service users and care coordinators

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Enhanced relapse prevention for bipolar disorder: a qualitative investigation of value perceived for service users and care coordinators. / Pontin, Eleanor; Peters, Sarah; Lobban, Fiona et al.
In: Implementation Science, Vol. 4, 4, 09.02.2009.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Pontin E, Peters S, Lobban F, Rogers A, Morriss RK. Enhanced relapse prevention for bipolar disorder: a qualitative investigation of value perceived for service users and care coordinators. Implementation Science. 2009 Feb 9;4:4. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-4

Author

Bibtex

@article{d5a6831be11d4e09a3691cc4db341794,
title = "Enhanced relapse prevention for bipolar disorder: a qualitative investigation of value perceived for service users and care coordinators",
abstract = "Background: Enhanced relapse prevention (ERP) is a psychological intervention delivered by mental health professionals to help individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) recognise and manage early warning signs for mania and depression. ERP has an emerging evidence base and is recommended as good practice for mental health professionals. However, without highly perceived value to both those receiving (services users) or delivering it (health professionals), implementation will not occur. The aim of this study is to determine what values of ERP are perceived by service users (SUs) and mental health professionals (care coordinators, CCs) providing community case management.Methods: A nested qualitative study design was employed as part of a randomised controlled trial of ERP. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sub-sample of 21 CCs and 21 SUs, and an iterative approach used to develop a framework of conceptual categories that was applied systematically to the data.Results: The process of implementing and receiving ERP was valued by both SUs and CCs for three similar sets of reasons: improved understanding of BD (where a knowledge deficit of BD was perceived), enhanced working relationships, and improved ways of managing the condition. There were some differences in the implications these had for both CCs and SUs who also held some reservations.Conclusion: CCs and SUs perceive similar value in early warning signs interventions to prevent relapse, and these have particular benefits to them. If this perceived value is maintained, CCs and SUs in routine practice may use ERP long-term.",
keywords = "PREVALENCE, PROGRAM, IMPLEMENTATION, INDIVIDUALS, MANAGEMENT, PATIENT, IMPACT, MODEL, MOOD",
author = "Eleanor Pontin and Sarah Peters and Fiona Lobban and Anne Rogers and Morriss, {Richard K.}",
year = "2009",
month = feb,
day = "9",
doi = "10.1186/1748-5908-4-4",
language = "English",
volume = "4",
journal = "Implementation Science",
issn = "1748-5908",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Enhanced relapse prevention for bipolar disorder

T2 - a qualitative investigation of value perceived for service users and care coordinators

AU - Pontin, Eleanor

AU - Peters, Sarah

AU - Lobban, Fiona

AU - Rogers, Anne

AU - Morriss, Richard K.

PY - 2009/2/9

Y1 - 2009/2/9

N2 - Background: Enhanced relapse prevention (ERP) is a psychological intervention delivered by mental health professionals to help individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) recognise and manage early warning signs for mania and depression. ERP has an emerging evidence base and is recommended as good practice for mental health professionals. However, without highly perceived value to both those receiving (services users) or delivering it (health professionals), implementation will not occur. The aim of this study is to determine what values of ERP are perceived by service users (SUs) and mental health professionals (care coordinators, CCs) providing community case management.Methods: A nested qualitative study design was employed as part of a randomised controlled trial of ERP. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sub-sample of 21 CCs and 21 SUs, and an iterative approach used to develop a framework of conceptual categories that was applied systematically to the data.Results: The process of implementing and receiving ERP was valued by both SUs and CCs for three similar sets of reasons: improved understanding of BD (where a knowledge deficit of BD was perceived), enhanced working relationships, and improved ways of managing the condition. There were some differences in the implications these had for both CCs and SUs who also held some reservations.Conclusion: CCs and SUs perceive similar value in early warning signs interventions to prevent relapse, and these have particular benefits to them. If this perceived value is maintained, CCs and SUs in routine practice may use ERP long-term.

AB - Background: Enhanced relapse prevention (ERP) is a psychological intervention delivered by mental health professionals to help individuals with bipolar disorder (BD) recognise and manage early warning signs for mania and depression. ERP has an emerging evidence base and is recommended as good practice for mental health professionals. However, without highly perceived value to both those receiving (services users) or delivering it (health professionals), implementation will not occur. The aim of this study is to determine what values of ERP are perceived by service users (SUs) and mental health professionals (care coordinators, CCs) providing community case management.Methods: A nested qualitative study design was employed as part of a randomised controlled trial of ERP. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sub-sample of 21 CCs and 21 SUs, and an iterative approach used to develop a framework of conceptual categories that was applied systematically to the data.Results: The process of implementing and receiving ERP was valued by both SUs and CCs for three similar sets of reasons: improved understanding of BD (where a knowledge deficit of BD was perceived), enhanced working relationships, and improved ways of managing the condition. There were some differences in the implications these had for both CCs and SUs who also held some reservations.Conclusion: CCs and SUs perceive similar value in early warning signs interventions to prevent relapse, and these have particular benefits to them. If this perceived value is maintained, CCs and SUs in routine practice may use ERP long-term.

KW - PREVALENCE

KW - PROGRAM

KW - IMPLEMENTATION

KW - INDIVIDUALS

KW - MANAGEMENT

KW - PATIENT

KW - IMPACT

KW - MODEL

KW - MOOD

U2 - 10.1186/1748-5908-4-4

DO - 10.1186/1748-5908-4-4

M3 - Journal article

VL - 4

JO - Implementation Science

JF - Implementation Science

SN - 1748-5908

M1 - 4

ER -