Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Environmental governance in China

Electronic data

  • JEMA.REV.orydgmarch27togroup_ss

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Environmental Management. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Environmental Management, 220, 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.104

    Accepted author manuscript, 889 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Environmental governance in China: Interactions between the state and “nonstate actors”

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
  • Dan Guttman
  • Oran Young
  • Yijia Jing
  • Barbara Bramble
  • Maoliang Bu
  • Carmen Chen
  • Kathinka Furst
  • Tao Hu
  • Yifei Li
  • Kate Logan
  • Lydia Price
  • Michael Spencer
  • Sangwon Suh
  • Xiaopu Sun
  • Bowen Tan
  • Harold Wang
  • Xin Wang
  • Juan Zhang
  • Xinxin Zhang
  • Rodrigo Zeidan
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>15/08/2018
<mark>Journal</mark>Journal of Environmental Management
Volume220
Number of pages10
Pages (from-to)126-135
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date26/05/18
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

In the West, limited government capacity to solve environmental problems has triggered the rise of a variety of “nonstate actors” to supplement government efforts or provide alternative mechanisms for addressing environmental issues. How does this development - along with our efforts to understand it - map onto environmental governance processes in China? China's efforts to address environmental issues reflect institutionalized governance processes that differ from parallel western processes in ways that have major consequences for domestic environmental governance practices and the governance of China “going abroad.” China's governance processes blur the distinction between the state and other actors; the “shadow of the state” is a major factor in all efforts to address environmental issues. The space occupied by nonstate actors in western systems is occupied by shiye danwei (“public service units”), she hui tuanti (“social associations”) and e-platforms, all of which have close links to the state. Meanwhile, international NGOs and multinational corporations are also significant players in China. As a result, the mechanisms of influence that produce effects in China differ in important ways from mechanisms familiar from the western experience. This conclusion has far-reaching implications for those seeking to address global environmental concerns, given the importance of China's growing economy and burgeoning network of trade relationships.

Bibliographic note

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Environmental Management. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Environmental Management, 20, 2018 DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.104