Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Psychology, Crime and Law on 31/10/2018, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1068316X.2018.1538416
Accepted author manuscript, 445 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Establishing the Most Effective Way to Deliver the Sketch Procedure to Enhance Interviewee Free Recall
AU - Eastwood, Joseph
AU - Snook, Brent
AU - Luther, Kirk
N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Psychology, Crime and Law on 31/10/2018, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1068316X.2018.1538416
PY - 2019/5/1
Y1 - 2019/5/1
N2 - The relative effectiveness of three sketching procedures for enhancing the recall of a witnessed event was assessed. Participants (N = 123) viewed a mock crime video and were asked to recall its contents using one of three sketching procedures (i.e., Sketch and Free Recall; Sketch then Free Recall; Sketch and Explain then Free Recall) or two comparison procedures (i.e., Mental Reinstatement of Context; Control). Participants who were administered the Sketch and Explain then Free Recall procedure recalled more correct details than those who were administered the other four procedures (all ds > 0.70); the greater number of correct details was observed primarily for object and action details. There was minimal difference in incorrect details recalled or accuracy rate between all five procedures. The implications of using different sketching procedures for enhancing recall at the onset of investigative interviews are discussed.
AB - The relative effectiveness of three sketching procedures for enhancing the recall of a witnessed event was assessed. Participants (N = 123) viewed a mock crime video and were asked to recall its contents using one of three sketching procedures (i.e., Sketch and Free Recall; Sketch then Free Recall; Sketch and Explain then Free Recall) or two comparison procedures (i.e., Mental Reinstatement of Context; Control). Participants who were administered the Sketch and Explain then Free Recall procedure recalled more correct details than those who were administered the other four procedures (all ds > 0.70); the greater number of correct details was observed primarily for object and action details. There was minimal difference in incorrect details recalled or accuracy rate between all five procedures. The implications of using different sketching procedures for enhancing recall at the onset of investigative interviews are discussed.
U2 - 10.1080/1068316X.2018.1538416
DO - 10.1080/1068316X.2018.1538416
M3 - Journal article
VL - 25
SP - 482
EP - 493
JO - Psychology, Crime and Law
JF - Psychology, Crime and Law
SN - 1068-316X
IS - 5
ER -