12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Evacuation, Hygiene, and Social Policy: The Our...
View graph of relations

« Back

Evacuation, Hygiene, and Social Policy: The Our Towns Report of 1943.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Journal publication date1999
JournalThe Historical Journal
Journal number3
Volume42
Number of pages27
Pages781-807
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

There has recently been much debate about social policy in Britain during the Second World War. This article takes up Jose Harris's suggestion that historians should look not at large-scale forces, but at ‘those minuscule roots of idiosyncratic private culture’. As a way into the complex amalgam that comprised ideas on social policy in the 1940s, we look in particular at the report on the evacuation of schoolchildren entitled Our towns: a close up, published by the Women's Group on Public Welfare in March 1943. Of course it is undeniable that one report is unrepresentative of all the many surveys that were produced on the evacuation experience. However, the initial wave of evacuation in September 1939 was the most significant, and the Our towns survey, along with a famous leader article in The Economist, has already received some selective attention from historians. Here we subject the survey to a more intensive examination, looking at the backgrounds of its authors, its content, and its reception by various professional groups. The article argues that it was the apparently contradictory nature of the report that explains its powerful appeal – it echoed interwar debates about behaviour and citizenship, but also reflected the ideas that would shape the welfare state in the post-war years.

Bibliographic note

http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=HIS The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, The Historical Journal, 42 (3), pp 781-807 1999, © 1999 Cambridge University Press.