12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Evading Capture
View graph of relations

Keywords

« Back

Evading Capture: Dialogues between the unknown and the unseen in the artist’s sketchpad and the scientific experiment

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference paper

Published

Publication date02/2011
Original languageEnglish

Conference

ConferenceRecto Verso: Redefining the Sketchbook
CountryUnited Kingdom
CityLincoln
Period10/02/1111/02/11

Abstract

This paper draws on research exploring, through drawing, relationships between the experimental tools of art and those in selected sciences. It asks whether the (often unseen and under-researched) function of the sketchbook as a tool of artistic enquiry might be explored and understood better through the paradigms of the scientific experiment.
At first glance, received ideas about the sketchpad would seem to resonate with established writing on the experiment which emphasise the subjective, aesthetic, contingent and open-ended characteristics of scientific experimentation: ‘ a generator of surprises’( Hoagland, 1990); ‘relations we seem to sense before we can clearly demonstrate them’(Rhineberger 1997); or ‘concepts in flux’ (Elkana 1970). Elsewhere, the presentation of scientists as ‘bricoleurs’ (Rheinberger, 1997) resembles recent descriptions of the activities of artist–researcher ( Stewart 2008, Petherbridge 2008).
The studio sketchpad is explored here using these frameworks appropriated from science studies, starting from the notion of the ‘epistemic thing’ (Rheinberger 1997): the provisional, the yet unimaginable. How might these apparent parallels aid understanding of what is often presented as the most honest, intimate and unseen artistic activity (e.g. Parshall 2008, Newman 2003, Cotter 2001)? What might it reveal about the sensuous knowledge, the slippage, the searching, the ‘failure’, fragmentation and resistance to resolution of sketchbook drawing? Or, are these parallels with scientific experimentation merely superficial, based more on a projected ideal than actuality? If the scientific model is insufficient for articulating the contemporary studio sketchpad, why? What might this dialogue with science reveal that otherwise slips through the net in received ideas about how sketchbooks do or should function? Ultimately, how then do we begin to address, study and articulate this elision?
These questions are explored through specific examples from a range of sources including the author’s own books generated during the research project.

Related research outputs