Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Evaluating HCI research beyond usability

Electronic data

  • 2018_chi-sig-eval

    Rights statement: © ACM, 2018. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of ACM for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in CHI 2018 - Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2018 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3170427.3185371

    Accepted author manuscript, 155 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Evaluating HCI research beyond usability

Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSNConference contribution/Paper

Published
Close
NullPointerException

Abstract

Evaluating research artefacts is an important step to showcase the validity of a chosen approach. The CHI community has developed and agreed upon a large variety of evaluation methods for HCI research; however, sometimes those methods are not applicable or not sufficient. This is especially the case when the contribution lies within the context of the application area, such as for research in sustainable HCI, HCI for development, or design fiction and futures studies. In this SIG, we invite the CHI community to share their insights from projects that encountered problems in evaluating research and aim to discuss solutions for this difficult topic. We invite researchers from all areas of HCI research who are interested to engage in a debate of issues in the process of validating research artefacts.

Bibliographic note

© ACM, 2018. This is the author's version of the work. It is posted here by permission of ACM for your personal use. Not for redistribution. The definitive version was published in CHI 2018 - Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2018 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/3170427.3185371