Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Evaluating stance-annotated sentences from poli...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Evaluating stance-annotated sentences from political blogs regarding the Brexit: a quantitative analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

E-pub ahead of print
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>11/04/2018
<mark>Journal</mark>ICAME Journal
Issue number1
Volume42
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print
Early online date11/04/18
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

This paper offers a formally driven quantitative analysis of stance-annotated sentences in the Brexit Blog Corpus (BBC). Our goal is to identify features that determine the formal profiles of six stance categories (contrariety, hypotheticality, necessity, prediction, source of knowledge and uncertainty) in a subset of the BBC. The study has two parts: firstly, it examines a large number of formal linguistic features, such as punctuation, words and grammatical categories that occur in the sentences in order to describe the specific characteristics of each category, and secondly, it compares characteristics in the entire data set in order to determine stance similarities in the data set. We show that among the six stance categories in the corpus, contrariety and necessity are the most discriminative ones, with the former using longer sentences, more conjunctions, more repetitions and shorter forms than the sentences expressing other stances. necessity has longer lexical forms but shorter sentences, which are syntactically more complex. We show that stance in our data set is expressed in sentences with around 21 words per sentence. The sentences consist mainly of alphabetical characters forming a varied vocabulary without special forms, such as digits or special characters.