Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Everyday experimentation in energy transition

Electronic data

  • Author accepted version

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Cleaner Production. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.034

    Accepted author manuscript, 3.11 MB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Everyday experimentation in energy transition: A practice-theoretical view

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Everyday experimentation in energy transition: A practice-theoretical view. / Jalas, Mikko; Hyysalo, Sampsa; Heiskanen, Eva et al.
In: Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 169, 15.12.2017, p. 77-84.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Jalas, M, Hyysalo, S, Heiskanen, E, Lovio, R, Nissinen, A, Mattinen, M, Rinkinen, J, Juntunen, JK, Tainio, P & Nissilä, H 2017, 'Everyday experimentation in energy transition: A practice-theoretical view', Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 169, pp. 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.034

APA

Jalas, M., Hyysalo, S., Heiskanen, E., Lovio, R., Nissinen, A., Mattinen, M., Rinkinen, J., Juntunen, J. K., Tainio, P., & Nissilä, H. (2017). Everyday experimentation in energy transition: A practice-theoretical view. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, 77-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.034

Vancouver

Jalas M, Hyysalo S, Heiskanen E, Lovio R, Nissinen A, Mattinen M et al. Everyday experimentation in energy transition: A practice-theoretical view. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017 Dec 15;169:77-84. Epub 2017 Mar 9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.034

Author

Jalas, Mikko ; Hyysalo, Sampsa ; Heiskanen, Eva et al. / Everyday experimentation in energy transition : A practice-theoretical view. In: Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017 ; Vol. 169. pp. 77-84.

Bibtex

@article{fd2db4900ea24d0998dd355a67f1a6a1,
title = "Everyday experimentation in energy transition: A practice-theoretical view",
abstract = "Research on sustainable practices has attracted increasing interest as a way to understand energy demand and transitions towards sustainability. In this paper we elaborate on how practice theories can inform the discussion of experimentation. Practice theory suggests that the everyday life of people appears recalcitrant. Practices are robust, resilient and have multiple, historically formed constituents and are thereby difficult to destabilize and change quickly. The making and breaking of links inside and between practices is highlighted, as is the need for enduring, multi-sited change efforts. Practice theory further helps us to better understand the constitution of new, levelled forms of expertise, the distributed nature of experimentation and the enrolment of citizens as active participants in sustainability transitions. We have operationalized and examined these suggestions in a Finnish research project related to climate change mitigation and energy use in detached houses. We report specific modes of experimentation and innovation, including user innovations, and the shared resources of situated expertise, the collective and shared processes of empowerment and the ways in which normality is challenged by ruptures in everyday life. Based on the results, we derive suggestions for effective policy interventions. We also bring forward a set of generic suggestions for more sensitive, appreciative and effective public policies on sustainability transitions and cast experimentation in a particular and partial role in such policies.",
keywords = "Sustainable practices, Experimentation, Climate change mitigation, Practice theory, Transition",
author = "Mikko Jalas and Sampsa Hyysalo and Eva Heiskanen and Raimo Lovio and Ari Nissinen and Maija Mattinen and Jenny Rinkinen and Juntunen, {Jouni K.} and Pasi Tainio and Heli Nissil{\"a}",
note = "This is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Cleaner Production. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.034",
year = "2017",
month = dec,
day = "15",
doi = "10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.034",
language = "English",
volume = "169",
pages = "77--84",
journal = "Journal of Cleaner Production",
issn = "0959-6526",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Everyday experimentation in energy transition

T2 - A practice-theoretical view

AU - Jalas, Mikko

AU - Hyysalo, Sampsa

AU - Heiskanen, Eva

AU - Lovio, Raimo

AU - Nissinen, Ari

AU - Mattinen, Maija

AU - Rinkinen, Jenny

AU - Juntunen, Jouni K.

AU - Tainio, Pasi

AU - Nissilä, Heli

N1 - This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Journal of Cleaner Production. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, 2017 DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.034

PY - 2017/12/15

Y1 - 2017/12/15

N2 - Research on sustainable practices has attracted increasing interest as a way to understand energy demand and transitions towards sustainability. In this paper we elaborate on how practice theories can inform the discussion of experimentation. Practice theory suggests that the everyday life of people appears recalcitrant. Practices are robust, resilient and have multiple, historically formed constituents and are thereby difficult to destabilize and change quickly. The making and breaking of links inside and between practices is highlighted, as is the need for enduring, multi-sited change efforts. Practice theory further helps us to better understand the constitution of new, levelled forms of expertise, the distributed nature of experimentation and the enrolment of citizens as active participants in sustainability transitions. We have operationalized and examined these suggestions in a Finnish research project related to climate change mitigation and energy use in detached houses. We report specific modes of experimentation and innovation, including user innovations, and the shared resources of situated expertise, the collective and shared processes of empowerment and the ways in which normality is challenged by ruptures in everyday life. Based on the results, we derive suggestions for effective policy interventions. We also bring forward a set of generic suggestions for more sensitive, appreciative and effective public policies on sustainability transitions and cast experimentation in a particular and partial role in such policies.

AB - Research on sustainable practices has attracted increasing interest as a way to understand energy demand and transitions towards sustainability. In this paper we elaborate on how practice theories can inform the discussion of experimentation. Practice theory suggests that the everyday life of people appears recalcitrant. Practices are robust, resilient and have multiple, historically formed constituents and are thereby difficult to destabilize and change quickly. The making and breaking of links inside and between practices is highlighted, as is the need for enduring, multi-sited change efforts. Practice theory further helps us to better understand the constitution of new, levelled forms of expertise, the distributed nature of experimentation and the enrolment of citizens as active participants in sustainability transitions. We have operationalized and examined these suggestions in a Finnish research project related to climate change mitigation and energy use in detached houses. We report specific modes of experimentation and innovation, including user innovations, and the shared resources of situated expertise, the collective and shared processes of empowerment and the ways in which normality is challenged by ruptures in everyday life. Based on the results, we derive suggestions for effective policy interventions. We also bring forward a set of generic suggestions for more sensitive, appreciative and effective public policies on sustainability transitions and cast experimentation in a particular and partial role in such policies.

KW - Sustainable practices

KW - Experimentation

KW - Climate change mitigation

KW - Practice theory

KW - Transition

U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.034

DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.034

M3 - Journal article

VL - 169

SP - 77

EP - 84

JO - Journal of Cleaner Production

JF - Journal of Cleaner Production

SN - 0959-6526

ER -