Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Explanations of success and failure in manageme...

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Explanations of success and failure in management learning: what can we learn from Nokia's rise and fall?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Explanations of success and failure in management learning: what can we learn from Nokia's rise and fall? / Laamanen, Tomi; Lamberg, Juha-antti; Vaara, Eero.
In: Academy of Management Learning and Education, Vol. 15, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 2-25.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Laamanen, T, Lamberg, J & Vaara, E 2016, 'Explanations of success and failure in management learning: what can we learn from Nokia's rise and fall?', Academy of Management Learning and Education, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 2-25. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2013.0177

APA

Vancouver

Laamanen T, Lamberg J, Vaara E. Explanations of success and failure in management learning: what can we learn from Nokia's rise and fall? Academy of Management Learning and Education. 2016 Mar 1;15(1):2-25. Epub 2015 Jan 6. doi: 10.5465/amle.2013.0177

Author

Laamanen, Tomi ; Lamberg, Juha-antti ; Vaara, Eero. / Explanations of success and failure in management learning : what can we learn from Nokia's rise and fall?. In: Academy of Management Learning and Education. 2016 ; Vol. 15, No. 1. pp. 2-25.

Bibtex

@article{bf21d64af5864900b7ed2492369637f8,
title = "Explanations of success and failure in management learning: what can we learn from Nokia's rise and fall?",
abstract = "We study the changing explanations of success and failure over the course of a firm{\textquoteright}s history, building on a discursive approach that highlights the role of narrative attributions in making sense of corporate performance. Specifically, we analyze how the Nokia Corporation was framed first as a success and later as a failure and how these dimensions of performance were explained in various actors{\textquoteright} narrative accounts. In both the success and failure accounts, our analysis revealed a striking black-and-white picture that resulted in the institutionalization of Nokia{\textquoteright}s metanarratives of success and failure. Our findings also reveal a number of discursive attributional tendencies, and thus, warn of the cognitive and politically motivated biases that are likely to characterize management literature.",
keywords = "strategic management, causal attribution, sense making, discourse analysis, narrative , management history",
author = "Tomi Laamanen and Juha-antti Lamberg and Eero Vaara",
year = "2016",
month = mar,
day = "1",
doi = "10.5465/amle.2013.0177",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "2--25",
journal = "Academy of Management Learning and Education",
issn = "1537-260X",
publisher = "George Washington University",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Explanations of success and failure in management learning

T2 - what can we learn from Nokia's rise and fall?

AU - Laamanen, Tomi

AU - Lamberg, Juha-antti

AU - Vaara, Eero

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - We study the changing explanations of success and failure over the course of a firm’s history, building on a discursive approach that highlights the role of narrative attributions in making sense of corporate performance. Specifically, we analyze how the Nokia Corporation was framed first as a success and later as a failure and how these dimensions of performance were explained in various actors’ narrative accounts. In both the success and failure accounts, our analysis revealed a striking black-and-white picture that resulted in the institutionalization of Nokia’s metanarratives of success and failure. Our findings also reveal a number of discursive attributional tendencies, and thus, warn of the cognitive and politically motivated biases that are likely to characterize management literature.

AB - We study the changing explanations of success and failure over the course of a firm’s history, building on a discursive approach that highlights the role of narrative attributions in making sense of corporate performance. Specifically, we analyze how the Nokia Corporation was framed first as a success and later as a failure and how these dimensions of performance were explained in various actors’ narrative accounts. In both the success and failure accounts, our analysis revealed a striking black-and-white picture that resulted in the institutionalization of Nokia’s metanarratives of success and failure. Our findings also reveal a number of discursive attributional tendencies, and thus, warn of the cognitive and politically motivated biases that are likely to characterize management literature.

KW - strategic management

KW - causal attribution

KW - sense making

KW - discourse analysis

KW - narrative

KW - management history

U2 - 10.5465/amle.2013.0177

DO - 10.5465/amle.2013.0177

M3 - Journal article

VL - 15

SP - 2

EP - 25

JO - Academy of Management Learning and Education

JF - Academy of Management Learning and Education

SN - 1537-260X

IS - 1

ER -