Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Exposure of polychlorinated naphthalenes (PCNs)...

Electronic data

  • Manuscript_without_track_changes

    Rights statement: This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Environmental Pollution. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Environmental Pollution, 259, 2020 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113838

    Accepted author manuscript, 386 KB, PDF document

    Embargo ends: 27/12/20

    Available under license: CC BY-NC-ND

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Exposure of polychlorinated naphthalenes (PCNs) to Pakistani populations via non-dietary sources from neglected e-waste hubs: A problem of high health concern

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published
Article number113838
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/04/2020
<mark>Journal</mark>Environmental Pollution
Volume259
Number of pages11
Publication statusPublished
Early online date27/12/19
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

To date limited information's are available concerning unintentional productions, screening, profiling, and health risks of polychlorinated naphthalenes (PCNs) in ambient environment and occupational environment. Literature reveals that dust is a neglected environmental matrix never measured for PCNs. To our knowledge, this is the first study to investigate the concentrations and health risks of PCNs in indoor dust, air, and blood of major e-waste recycling hubs in Pakistan. Indoor air (n = 125), dust (n = 250), and serum (n = 250) samples were collected from five major e-waste hubs and their vicinity to measure 39 PCN congeners using GC-ECNI-MS. ∑ 39PCN concentrations in indoor air, dust, and serum (worker > resident > children) samples ranged from 7.0 to 9583 pg/m 3, from 0.25 to 697 ng/g, and from 0.15 to 401 pg/g lipid weight, respectively. Predominant PCN congeners in indoor air and dust were tri- and tetra-CNs, while tetra- and penta-CNs were dominant in human serum samples. The higher PCNs contribution was recorded at the recycling units, while the lower was observed at the shops of the major e-waste hubs. Higher contribution of combustion origin CNs in air, dust and human samples showed combustion sources at the major e-waste hubs, while Halowax and Aroclor based technical mixture showed minor contribution in these samples. Mean toxic equivalent (TEQ) concentrations of PCNs were 2.79E +00 pg-TEQ/m 3, 1.60E −02 ng-TEQ/g, 8.11E −01 pg-TEQ/g, 7.14E −01 pg-TEQ/g, and 6.37E −01 pg-TEQ/g for indoor air, dust, and serum samples from workers, residents, and children, respectively. In our study, CNs- 66/67 and −73 in indoor air, dust, and human serum were the great contributors to total TEQ concentrations of PCNs. This first base line data directs government and agencies to implement rules, regulation to avoid negative health outcomes and suggests further awareness in regard of provision of proper knowledge to the target population. Due to lack of data on production, screening, and profiling of PCNs, this is the first study to investigate concentrations of PCNs in indoor dust, air, and blood serum at the major e-waste recycling hubs in Pakistan where crude recycling methods were common and the potential health risks to human via its non-dietary pathways exposure would experience. This study results identified that Tri-to penta-CNs were dominant in the environmental samples and showed that higher PCNs contribution in the environmental samples was recorded by Combustion based activities as compared to technical mixture based CNs.

Bibliographic note

This is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Environmental Pollution. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Environmental Pollution, 259, 2020 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113838