Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Facial distinctiveness: its measurement, distri...
View graph of relations

Facial distinctiveness: its measurement, distribution and influence on immediate and delayed recognition.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Facial distinctiveness: its measurement, distribution and influence on immediate and delayed recognition. / Wickham, Lee H. V.; Morris, Peter E.; Fritz, Catherine O.

In: British Journal of Psychology, Vol. 91, No. 1, 02.2000, p. 99-123.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{3faf8d3e517a493f97f1f38d98e2a6f0,
title = "Facial distinctiveness: its measurement, distribution and influence on immediate and delayed recognition.",
abstract = "It is conventionally assumed that many faces are relatively typical and few are distinctive (e.g. Valentine, 1991), producing a highly skewed distribution. However, Burton and Vokey (1998) argue that the distribution will be normal, and our review of previous research suggested this is true. In three studies we explored the distributions using different techniques to estimate distinctiveness. Both traditional ratings and pairwise selection produced normal distributions. However, ratings emphasizing the degree of deviation from a typical face were skewed towards the distinctive end of the scale. The instructions given when distinctiveness is rated may not necessarily oppose typicality with distinctiveness: a face that is relatively typical might also stand out in a crowd because of some particular feature, familiarity or a host of other reasons. In our fourth study, recognition memory was predicted by all of the distinctiveness measures, with the relationship being stronger after a 5-week delay than in the immediate test.",
author = "Wickham, {Lee H. V.} and Morris, {Peter E.} and Fritz, {Catherine O.}",
year = "2000",
month = feb
language = "English",
volume = "91",
pages = "99--123",
journal = "British Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0007-1269",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Facial distinctiveness: its measurement, distribution and influence on immediate and delayed recognition.

AU - Wickham, Lee H. V.

AU - Morris, Peter E.

AU - Fritz, Catherine O.

PY - 2000/2

Y1 - 2000/2

N2 - It is conventionally assumed that many faces are relatively typical and few are distinctive (e.g. Valentine, 1991), producing a highly skewed distribution. However, Burton and Vokey (1998) argue that the distribution will be normal, and our review of previous research suggested this is true. In three studies we explored the distributions using different techniques to estimate distinctiveness. Both traditional ratings and pairwise selection produced normal distributions. However, ratings emphasizing the degree of deviation from a typical face were skewed towards the distinctive end of the scale. The instructions given when distinctiveness is rated may not necessarily oppose typicality with distinctiveness: a face that is relatively typical might also stand out in a crowd because of some particular feature, familiarity or a host of other reasons. In our fourth study, recognition memory was predicted by all of the distinctiveness measures, with the relationship being stronger after a 5-week delay than in the immediate test.

AB - It is conventionally assumed that many faces are relatively typical and few are distinctive (e.g. Valentine, 1991), producing a highly skewed distribution. However, Burton and Vokey (1998) argue that the distribution will be normal, and our review of previous research suggested this is true. In three studies we explored the distributions using different techniques to estimate distinctiveness. Both traditional ratings and pairwise selection produced normal distributions. However, ratings emphasizing the degree of deviation from a typical face were skewed towards the distinctive end of the scale. The instructions given when distinctiveness is rated may not necessarily oppose typicality with distinctiveness: a face that is relatively typical might also stand out in a crowd because of some particular feature, familiarity or a host of other reasons. In our fourth study, recognition memory was predicted by all of the distinctiveness measures, with the relationship being stronger after a 5-week delay than in the immediate test.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 91

SP - 99

EP - 123

JO - British Journal of Psychology

JF - British Journal of Psychology

SN - 0007-1269

IS - 1

ER -