Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Fairness in ancillary relief

Associated organisational unit

View graph of relations

Fairness in ancillary relief

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Fairness in ancillary relief. / Williams, Catherine; Potter, Gary.
In: Web Journal of Current Legal Issues, Vol. 2007, No. 1, 3, 2007.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Williams, C & Potter, G 2007, 'Fairness in ancillary relief', Web Journal of Current Legal Issues, vol. 2007, no. 1, 3. <http://www.bailii.org/uk/other/journals/WebJCLI/2007/issue1/williams1.html>

APA

Williams, C., & Potter, G. (2007). Fairness in ancillary relief. Web Journal of Current Legal Issues, 2007(1), Article 3. http://www.bailii.org/uk/other/journals/WebJCLI/2007/issue1/williams1.html

Vancouver

Williams C, Potter G. Fairness in ancillary relief. Web Journal of Current Legal Issues. 2007;2007(1):3.

Author

Williams, Catherine ; Potter, Gary. / Fairness in ancillary relief. In: Web Journal of Current Legal Issues. 2007 ; Vol. 2007, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{539a377e6c594fc09e7fc2011531bcb4,
title = "Fairness in ancillary relief",
abstract = "This article stems from setting student projects. It describes in detail the outcome of a project designed to ascertain the views of the public in relation to ancillary relief and what they consider to be a {\textquoteleft}fair{\textquoteright} outcome. The rationale for undertaking student projects has been discussed at length in another article and is therefore only alluded to here. The discussion centres around the law, findings and outcome of the project. Students studying the Family Law course at Sheffield University were required to survey members of the public in order to gather their views on the division of assets on divorce and then to analyse the public{\textquoteright}s response in light of the seminal decision of the House of Lords in White v White [2000] UKHL 54; [2001] 1 AC 596.",
author = "Catherine Williams and Gary Potter",
year = "2007",
language = "English",
volume = "2007",
journal = "Web Journal of Current Legal Issues",
issn = "1360-1326",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fairness in ancillary relief

AU - Williams, Catherine

AU - Potter, Gary

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - This article stems from setting student projects. It describes in detail the outcome of a project designed to ascertain the views of the public in relation to ancillary relief and what they consider to be a ‘fair’ outcome. The rationale for undertaking student projects has been discussed at length in another article and is therefore only alluded to here. The discussion centres around the law, findings and outcome of the project. Students studying the Family Law course at Sheffield University were required to survey members of the public in order to gather their views on the division of assets on divorce and then to analyse the public’s response in light of the seminal decision of the House of Lords in White v White [2000] UKHL 54; [2001] 1 AC 596.

AB - This article stems from setting student projects. It describes in detail the outcome of a project designed to ascertain the views of the public in relation to ancillary relief and what they consider to be a ‘fair’ outcome. The rationale for undertaking student projects has been discussed at length in another article and is therefore only alluded to here. The discussion centres around the law, findings and outcome of the project. Students studying the Family Law course at Sheffield University were required to survey members of the public in order to gather their views on the division of assets on divorce and then to analyse the public’s response in light of the seminal decision of the House of Lords in White v White [2000] UKHL 54; [2001] 1 AC 596.

M3 - Journal article

VL - 2007

JO - Web Journal of Current Legal Issues

JF - Web Journal of Current Legal Issues

SN - 1360-1326

IS - 1

M1 - 3

ER -