Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Fascism 'charisma' and 'charismatisation' : Web...
View graph of relations

Fascism 'charisma' and 'charismatisation' : Weber's model of 'charismatic domination' and interwar European fascism.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Fascism 'charisma' and 'charismatisation' : Weber's model of 'charismatic domination' and interwar European fascism. / Kallis, A. A.
In: Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2006, p. 25-43.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Kallis AA. Fascism 'charisma' and 'charismatisation' : Weber's model of 'charismatic domination' and interwar European fascism. Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions. 2006;7(1):25-43. doi: 10.1080/14690760500503185

Author

Kallis, A. A. / Fascism 'charisma' and 'charismatisation' : Weber's model of 'charismatic domination' and interwar European fascism. In: Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions. 2006 ; Vol. 7, No. 1. pp. 25-43.

Bibtex

@article{4e48186dccb24985969d05eb55eb4f53,
title = "Fascism 'charisma' and 'charismatisation' : Weber's model of 'charismatic domination' and interwar European fascism.",
abstract = "The special position that many fascist leaders eventually occupied in the political and psychological structures of their movements alludes to an exceptional degree of charismatisation by the community of their followers. Less clear, however, is the relation between the fascist leader's 'cult' and society as a 'charismatic community' (Gemeinde). This article examines the relation between fascist ideology and 'charisma', drawing a distinction between the Weberian notion of 'charismatic domination' and the fascist 'leadership cult'. It also challenges the mono-causal explanation of fascist rule as irrational-charismatic, arguing instead in favour of a composite model of both genuine and manufactured, that is rationally pursued, processes of charismatisation that were quantitatively and qualitatively different across the spectrum of fascist leaders and regimes in the interwar period. The concerted charismatisation of the fascist leader, through propaganda and state-imposed rituals, did not automatically generate a genuine model of charismatic domination, even if instances and routines of adulation did become established and widespread. Here, the conceptual confusion behind the often-interchangeable use of the terms 'charismatic leadership' and 'cult of the leader' is evident. What will become clear is that, in the context of interwar fascism, the existence of a genuine charismatic personality neither guaranteed the establishment of a regime nor produced automatically a model of 'charismatic domination'. Similarly, the relative absence of specific charismatic qualities in the personality of a leader did not prevent a regime from either promoting a systematic 'leadership cult' or producing a modicum of 'charismatisation'. Only in National Socialist Germany did the leader's charisma and the 'leadership cult' come close to transforming society into a genuine 'charismatic community'; but even during the Nazi regime patterns of 'charismatic domination' coalesced with both 'traditional' and 'bureaucratic' forms of legitimacy.",
author = "Kallis, {A. A.}",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1080/14690760500503185",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "25--43",
journal = "Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions",
issn = "1469-0764",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fascism 'charisma' and 'charismatisation' : Weber's model of 'charismatic domination' and interwar European fascism.

AU - Kallis, A. A.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - The special position that many fascist leaders eventually occupied in the political and psychological structures of their movements alludes to an exceptional degree of charismatisation by the community of their followers. Less clear, however, is the relation between the fascist leader's 'cult' and society as a 'charismatic community' (Gemeinde). This article examines the relation between fascist ideology and 'charisma', drawing a distinction between the Weberian notion of 'charismatic domination' and the fascist 'leadership cult'. It also challenges the mono-causal explanation of fascist rule as irrational-charismatic, arguing instead in favour of a composite model of both genuine and manufactured, that is rationally pursued, processes of charismatisation that were quantitatively and qualitatively different across the spectrum of fascist leaders and regimes in the interwar period. The concerted charismatisation of the fascist leader, through propaganda and state-imposed rituals, did not automatically generate a genuine model of charismatic domination, even if instances and routines of adulation did become established and widespread. Here, the conceptual confusion behind the often-interchangeable use of the terms 'charismatic leadership' and 'cult of the leader' is evident. What will become clear is that, in the context of interwar fascism, the existence of a genuine charismatic personality neither guaranteed the establishment of a regime nor produced automatically a model of 'charismatic domination'. Similarly, the relative absence of specific charismatic qualities in the personality of a leader did not prevent a regime from either promoting a systematic 'leadership cult' or producing a modicum of 'charismatisation'. Only in National Socialist Germany did the leader's charisma and the 'leadership cult' come close to transforming society into a genuine 'charismatic community'; but even during the Nazi regime patterns of 'charismatic domination' coalesced with both 'traditional' and 'bureaucratic' forms of legitimacy.

AB - The special position that many fascist leaders eventually occupied in the political and psychological structures of their movements alludes to an exceptional degree of charismatisation by the community of their followers. Less clear, however, is the relation between the fascist leader's 'cult' and society as a 'charismatic community' (Gemeinde). This article examines the relation between fascist ideology and 'charisma', drawing a distinction between the Weberian notion of 'charismatic domination' and the fascist 'leadership cult'. It also challenges the mono-causal explanation of fascist rule as irrational-charismatic, arguing instead in favour of a composite model of both genuine and manufactured, that is rationally pursued, processes of charismatisation that were quantitatively and qualitatively different across the spectrum of fascist leaders and regimes in the interwar period. The concerted charismatisation of the fascist leader, through propaganda and state-imposed rituals, did not automatically generate a genuine model of charismatic domination, even if instances and routines of adulation did become established and widespread. Here, the conceptual confusion behind the often-interchangeable use of the terms 'charismatic leadership' and 'cult of the leader' is evident. What will become clear is that, in the context of interwar fascism, the existence of a genuine charismatic personality neither guaranteed the establishment of a regime nor produced automatically a model of 'charismatic domination'. Similarly, the relative absence of specific charismatic qualities in the personality of a leader did not prevent a regime from either promoting a systematic 'leadership cult' or producing a modicum of 'charismatisation'. Only in National Socialist Germany did the leader's charisma and the 'leadership cult' come close to transforming society into a genuine 'charismatic community'; but even during the Nazi regime patterns of 'charismatic domination' coalesced with both 'traditional' and 'bureaucratic' forms of legitimacy.

U2 - 10.1080/14690760500503185

DO - 10.1080/14690760500503185

M3 - Journal article

VL - 7

SP - 25

EP - 43

JO - Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions

JF - Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions

SN - 1469-0764

IS - 1

ER -