Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > 'Firing Canons to Kill Mosquitoes'

Electronic data

  • Accepted_21st_March_2020_before_copyedits_Lacy_Mookherjee_CIS

    Rights statement: The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Contributions to Indian Sociology, 54 (2), 2020, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2020 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Contributions to Indian Sociology page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/cis on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/

    Accepted author manuscript, 744 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

'Firing Canons to Kill Mosquitoes': Controlling 'virtual' streets and the 'image of the state' in Bangladesh

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published
Close
<mark>Journal publication date</mark>1/06/2020
<mark>Journal</mark>Contributions to Indian Sociology
Issue number2
Volume54
Number of pages26
Pages (from-to)280-305
Publication StatusPublished
Early online date14/05/20
<mark>Original language</mark>English

Abstract

This article examines the historical, social and political legacies of the Information and Communication Technology Act (ICT Act) (2006–2018, amended in 2013) and the Digital Security Act (DSA) (2018–) in the Bangladeshi state’s attempt to control the virtual ‘streets’ of Bangladesh. The application of ICT and DSA has become an increasingly visible and controversial means to provide the spectacle of a state that extends disciplinary power and governmentality into proliferating online spaces—akin to ‘Firing cannons to kill mosquitoes’. We use the lens of Tim Mitchell’s structural-effect (1991, The American Political Science Review 85(1), 77–96) to understand the state beyond the frameworks of its salience or elusiveness, arguing that the criminalisation of online speech has enabled the creation of ‘digital vigilantes’ who are predominantly the powerful, the sycophants, a multitude of attention seekers who are driven by their personal contestations and ambitions. The legal outcomes, however, have been more ambiguous and uncertain—but the effect is to produce fear as an ‘environment’ (Virilio 2012, The Administration of Fear. Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press) through frozen/suspended charges with the potential to be redeployed in different contexts.</Abs> <kw>Keywords: Digital security, digital vigilantes, governmentality, structural-effect, surveillance</kw>

Bibliographic note

The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Contributions to Indian Sociology, 54 (2), 2020, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2020 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Contributions to Indian Sociology page: https://journals.sagepub.com/home/cis on SAGE Journals Online: http://journals.sagepub.com/