Final published version
Licence: CC BY: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - First accelerator test of vacuum components with laser-engineered surfaces for electron-cloud mitigation
AU - Calatroni, Sergio
AU - Valdivieso, Elisa Garcia-Tabares
AU - Neupert, Holger
AU - Nistor, Valentin
AU - Fontenla, Ana Teresa Perez
AU - Taborelli, Mauro
AU - Chiggiato, Paolo
AU - Malyshev, Oleg
AU - Valizadeh, Reza
AU - Wackerow, Stefan
AU - Zolotovskaya, Svetlana
AU - Gillespie, W. Allan
AU - Abdolvand, Amin
PY - 2017/11/20
Y1 - 2017/11/20
N2 - Electron cloud mitigation is an essential requirement for high-intensity proton circular accelerators. Among other solutions, laser engineered surface structures (LESS) present the advantages of having potentially a very low secondary electron yield (SEY) and allowing simple scalability for mass production. Two copper liners with LESS have been manufactured and successfully tested by monitoring the electron cloud current in a dipole magnet in the SPS accelerator at CERN during the 2016 run. In this paper we report on these results as well as the detailed experiments carried out on samples—such as the SEYand topography studies—which led to an optimized treatment in view of the SPS test and future possible use in the HL-LHC.
AB - Electron cloud mitigation is an essential requirement for high-intensity proton circular accelerators. Among other solutions, laser engineered surface structures (LESS) present the advantages of having potentially a very low secondary electron yield (SEY) and allowing simple scalability for mass production. Two copper liners with LESS have been manufactured and successfully tested by monitoring the electron cloud current in a dipole magnet in the SPS accelerator at CERN during the 2016 run. In this paper we report on these results as well as the detailed experiments carried out on samples—such as the SEYand topography studies—which led to an optimized treatment in view of the SPS test and future possible use in the HL-LHC.
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.20.113201
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.20.113201
M3 - Journal article
VL - 20
JO - Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
JF - Physical Review Accelerators and Beams
SN - 2469-9888
IS - 11
M1 - 113201
ER -