Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Flexible workers in inferior jobs
View graph of relations

Flexible workers in inferior jobs: re-appraising the evidence

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Flexible workers in inferior jobs: re-appraising the evidence. / Green, C; Kler, P; Leeves, G.
In: British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 48, No. 3, 09.2010, p. 605-629.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Green, C, Kler, P & Leeves, G 2010, 'Flexible workers in inferior jobs: re-appraising the evidence', British Journal of Industrial Relations, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 605-629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2009.00742.x

APA

Green, C., Kler, P., & Leeves, G. (2010). Flexible workers in inferior jobs: re-appraising the evidence. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 48(3), 605-629. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8543.2009.00742.x

Vancouver

Green C, Kler P, Leeves G. Flexible workers in inferior jobs: re-appraising the evidence. British Journal of Industrial Relations. 2010 Sept;48(3):605-629. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2009.00742.x

Author

Green, C ; Kler, P ; Leeves, G. / Flexible workers in inferior jobs : re-appraising the evidence. In: British Journal of Industrial Relations. 2010 ; Vol. 48, No. 3. pp. 605-629.

Bibtex

@article{5ed069f7b71e47c8b23ed7865fe00ab5,
title = "Flexible workers in inferior jobs: re-appraising the evidence",
abstract = "There is concern that the increase in flexible employment contracts witnessed in many OECD economies is evidence of a growth in low-pay, low-quality jobs. In practice, it is difficult to evaluate the {\textquoteleft}quality{\textquoteright} of flexible jobs. Previous research has primarily investigated objective measures of job quality such as wages and training or subjective measures such as job satisfaction. We jointly evaluate these elements of flexible employment contracts using a job quality index. Analysis of this index demonstrates that flexible jobs are of a lower quality. Differences in the subjective and objective assessment of factors like pay and hours are evident.",
author = "C Green and P Kler and G Leeves",
note = "This is a pre-print of an article published in British Journal of Industrial Relations, 48 (3), 2010. (c) Wiley.",
year = "2010",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1111/j.1467-8543.2009.00742.x",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "605--629",
journal = "British Journal of Industrial Relations",
issn = "0007-1080",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Flexible workers in inferior jobs

T2 - re-appraising the evidence

AU - Green, C

AU - Kler, P

AU - Leeves, G

N1 - This is a pre-print of an article published in British Journal of Industrial Relations, 48 (3), 2010. (c) Wiley.

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - There is concern that the increase in flexible employment contracts witnessed in many OECD economies is evidence of a growth in low-pay, low-quality jobs. In practice, it is difficult to evaluate the ‘quality’ of flexible jobs. Previous research has primarily investigated objective measures of job quality such as wages and training or subjective measures such as job satisfaction. We jointly evaluate these elements of flexible employment contracts using a job quality index. Analysis of this index demonstrates that flexible jobs are of a lower quality. Differences in the subjective and objective assessment of factors like pay and hours are evident.

AB - There is concern that the increase in flexible employment contracts witnessed in many OECD economies is evidence of a growth in low-pay, low-quality jobs. In practice, it is difficult to evaluate the ‘quality’ of flexible jobs. Previous research has primarily investigated objective measures of job quality such as wages and training or subjective measures such as job satisfaction. We jointly evaluate these elements of flexible employment contracts using a job quality index. Analysis of this index demonstrates that flexible jobs are of a lower quality. Differences in the subjective and objective assessment of factors like pay and hours are evident.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2009.00742.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1467-8543.2009.00742.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 48

SP - 605

EP - 629

JO - British Journal of Industrial Relations

JF - British Journal of Industrial Relations

SN - 0007-1080

IS - 3

ER -