Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > For Queen and country? : National frames of ref...
View graph of relations

For Queen and country? : National frames of reference in the talk of soldiers in England.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

For Queen and country? : National frames of reference in the talk of soldiers in England. / Gibson, Stephen; Abell, Jackie.
In: Human Relations, Vol. 57, No. 7, 01.07.2004, p. 871-891.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Gibson S, Abell J. For Queen and country? : National frames of reference in the talk of soldiers in England. Human Relations. 2004 Jul 1;57(7):871-891. doi: 10.1177/0018726704045769

Author

Gibson, Stephen ; Abell, Jackie. / For Queen and country? : National frames of reference in the talk of soldiers in England. In: Human Relations. 2004 ; Vol. 57, No. 7. pp. 871-891.

Bibtex

@article{af9c404d9a0e45cca3115ac1c0482d09,
title = "For Queen and country? : National frames of reference in the talk of soldiers in England.",
abstract = "Social scientists frequently use the iconic figure of the soldier who fights and dies for the nation to exemplify the power of processes of national identification. However, little work has considered how soldiers themselves orient to the possibility of being motivated by a desire to {\textquoteleft}serve the country{\textquoteright}. The present study explored this through a series of interviews with members of the British Army and Territorial Army. Although in explicit talk about {\textquoteleft}the country{\textquoteright} the soldiers typically downplayed the importance of {\textquoteleft}serving the country{\textquoteright} as motivation, in discussing the prospect of a European army the national basis of armies was taken for granted. The findings are discussed in terms of the problematic nature of displays of English {\textquoteleft}patriotism{\textquoteright} or {\textquoteleft}pride{\textquoteright}. It is argued that the relationship between national identity and military service, often assumed to be straightforward in social scientific texts, is oriented to as a delicate issue by soldiers themselves.",
keywords = "armed forces • England • Europe • military service • national identity • soldiers",
author = "Stephen Gibson and Jackie Abell",
year = "2004",
month = jul,
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0018726704045769",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "871--891",
journal = "Human Relations",
issn = "1741-282X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "7",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - For Queen and country? : National frames of reference in the talk of soldiers in England.

AU - Gibson, Stephen

AU - Abell, Jackie

PY - 2004/7/1

Y1 - 2004/7/1

N2 - Social scientists frequently use the iconic figure of the soldier who fights and dies for the nation to exemplify the power of processes of national identification. However, little work has considered how soldiers themselves orient to the possibility of being motivated by a desire to ‘serve the country’. The present study explored this through a series of interviews with members of the British Army and Territorial Army. Although in explicit talk about ‘the country’ the soldiers typically downplayed the importance of ‘serving the country’ as motivation, in discussing the prospect of a European army the national basis of armies was taken for granted. The findings are discussed in terms of the problematic nature of displays of English ‘patriotism’ or ‘pride’. It is argued that the relationship between national identity and military service, often assumed to be straightforward in social scientific texts, is oriented to as a delicate issue by soldiers themselves.

AB - Social scientists frequently use the iconic figure of the soldier who fights and dies for the nation to exemplify the power of processes of national identification. However, little work has considered how soldiers themselves orient to the possibility of being motivated by a desire to ‘serve the country’. The present study explored this through a series of interviews with members of the British Army and Territorial Army. Although in explicit talk about ‘the country’ the soldiers typically downplayed the importance of ‘serving the country’ as motivation, in discussing the prospect of a European army the national basis of armies was taken for granted. The findings are discussed in terms of the problematic nature of displays of English ‘patriotism’ or ‘pride’. It is argued that the relationship between national identity and military service, often assumed to be straightforward in social scientific texts, is oriented to as a delicate issue by soldiers themselves.

KW - armed forces • England • Europe • military service • national identity • soldiers

U2 - 10.1177/0018726704045769

DO - 10.1177/0018726704045769

M3 - Journal article

VL - 57

SP - 871

EP - 891

JO - Human Relations

JF - Human Relations

SN - 1741-282X

IS - 7

ER -