Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > From Political to Realist Essentialism: Rereadi...

Electronic data

  • Microsoft_Word_-_442F403.pdf

    214 KB, PDF document

Links

View graph of relations

From Political to Realist Essentialism: Rereading Luce Irigaray.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

From Political to Realist Essentialism: Rereading Luce Irigaray. / Stone, Alison.

In: Feminist Theory, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2004, p. 5-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Stone, Alison. / From Political to Realist Essentialism: Rereading Luce Irigaray. In: Feminist Theory. 2004 ; Vol. 5, No. 1. pp. 5-23.

Bibtex

@article{31447f60558449479815f0f12dfa5aab,
title = "From Political to Realist Essentialism: Rereading Luce Irigaray.",
abstract = "This paper re-examines debates surrounding Irigaray's 'essentialism', arguing that these debates have generated a widespread assumption that realist essentialism is philosophically untenable and that Irigaray must therefore be read as a non-realist, merely 'political', essentialist. I suggest that this assumption is unhelpful, as Irigaray's work shows increasing commitment to a realist form of essentialism. Moreover, I argue that political essentialism is internally unstable because it aims to revalue femininity and the body as symbolised, thereby reinforcing the traditional conceptual hierarchy of the symbolic over the corporeal. I reinterpret Irigaray's own work as moving away from her earlier political essentialist project of revaluing symbolic femininity, towards the realism of her recent thought, which urges us to revalue and transfigure real, sexually differentiated, bodies by pursuing their cultural expression and enhancement. I aim to show that Irigaray's recent work is philosophically coherent and sophisticated, and that it opens up the possibility of a radical and transformative kind of realist essentialism.",
keywords = "essentialism, sexual difference, body, matter, realism",
author = "Alison Stone",
note = "“The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Feminist Theory, 5 (1), 2004, {\textcopyright} SAGE Publications Ltd, 2004 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Feminist Theory page: http://fty.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
volume = "5",
pages = "5--23",
journal = "Feminist Theory",
issn = "1464-7001",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - From Political to Realist Essentialism: Rereading Luce Irigaray.

AU - Stone, Alison

N1 - “The final, definitive version of this article has been published in the Journal, Feminist Theory, 5 (1), 2004, © SAGE Publications Ltd, 2004 by SAGE Publications Ltd at the Feminist Theory page: http://fty.sagepub.com/ on SAGE Journals Online: http://online.sagepub.com/

PY - 2004

Y1 - 2004

N2 - This paper re-examines debates surrounding Irigaray's 'essentialism', arguing that these debates have generated a widespread assumption that realist essentialism is philosophically untenable and that Irigaray must therefore be read as a non-realist, merely 'political', essentialist. I suggest that this assumption is unhelpful, as Irigaray's work shows increasing commitment to a realist form of essentialism. Moreover, I argue that political essentialism is internally unstable because it aims to revalue femininity and the body as symbolised, thereby reinforcing the traditional conceptual hierarchy of the symbolic over the corporeal. I reinterpret Irigaray's own work as moving away from her earlier political essentialist project of revaluing symbolic femininity, towards the realism of her recent thought, which urges us to revalue and transfigure real, sexually differentiated, bodies by pursuing their cultural expression and enhancement. I aim to show that Irigaray's recent work is philosophically coherent and sophisticated, and that it opens up the possibility of a radical and transformative kind of realist essentialism.

AB - This paper re-examines debates surrounding Irigaray's 'essentialism', arguing that these debates have generated a widespread assumption that realist essentialism is philosophically untenable and that Irigaray must therefore be read as a non-realist, merely 'political', essentialist. I suggest that this assumption is unhelpful, as Irigaray's work shows increasing commitment to a realist form of essentialism. Moreover, I argue that political essentialism is internally unstable because it aims to revalue femininity and the body as symbolised, thereby reinforcing the traditional conceptual hierarchy of the symbolic over the corporeal. I reinterpret Irigaray's own work as moving away from her earlier political essentialist project of revaluing symbolic femininity, towards the realism of her recent thought, which urges us to revalue and transfigure real, sexually differentiated, bodies by pursuing their cultural expression and enhancement. I aim to show that Irigaray's recent work is philosophically coherent and sophisticated, and that it opens up the possibility of a radical and transformative kind of realist essentialism.

KW - essentialism

KW - sexual difference

KW - body

KW - matter

KW - realism

M3 - Journal article

VL - 5

SP - 5

EP - 23

JO - Feminist Theory

JF - Feminist Theory

SN - 1464-7001

IS - 1

ER -