Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Fugacity modelling to predict the distribution ...
View graph of relations

Fugacity modelling to predict the distribution of organic contaminants in the soil: oil matrix of constructed biopiles.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Fugacity modelling to predict the distribution of organic contaminants in the soil: oil matrix of constructed biopiles. / Pollard, Simon J. T.; Hough, Rupert L.; Kim, Kye-Hoon et al.
In: Chemosphere, Vol. 71, No. 8, 04.2008, p. 1432-1439.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Pollard, SJT, Hough, RL, Kim, K-H, Bellarby, J, Paton, G, Semple, KT & Coulon, F 2008, 'Fugacity modelling to predict the distribution of organic contaminants in the soil: oil matrix of constructed biopiles.', Chemosphere, vol. 71, no. 8, pp. 1432-1439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.12.007

APA

Pollard, S. J. T., Hough, R. L., Kim, K-H., Bellarby, J., Paton, G., Semple, K. T., & Coulon, F. (2008). Fugacity modelling to predict the distribution of organic contaminants in the soil: oil matrix of constructed biopiles. Chemosphere, 71(8), 1432-1439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.12.007

Vancouver

Pollard SJT, Hough RL, Kim K-H, Bellarby J, Paton G, Semple KT et al. Fugacity modelling to predict the distribution of organic contaminants in the soil: oil matrix of constructed biopiles. Chemosphere. 2008 Apr;71(8):1432-1439. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.12.007

Author

Pollard, Simon J. T. ; Hough, Rupert L. ; Kim, Kye-Hoon et al. / Fugacity modelling to predict the distribution of organic contaminants in the soil: oil matrix of constructed biopiles. In: Chemosphere. 2008 ; Vol. 71, No. 8. pp. 1432-1439.

Bibtex

@article{f94fcc48499843179022246c9dae6a71,
title = "Fugacity modelling to predict the distribution of organic contaminants in the soil: oil matrix of constructed biopiles.",
abstract = "Level I and II fugacity approaches were used to model the environmental distribution of benzene, anthracene, phenanthrene, 1-methylphenanthrene and benzo[a]pyrene in a four phase biopile system, accounting for air, water, mineral soil and non-aqueous phase liquid (oil) phase. The non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) and soil phases were the dominant partition media for the contaminants in each biopile and the contaminants differed markedly in their individual fugacities. Comparison of three soils with different percentage of organic carbon (% org C) showed that the % org C influenced contaminant partitioning behaviour. While benzene showed an aqueous concentration worthy of note for leachate control during biopiling, other organic chemicals showed that insignificant amount of chemicals leached into the water, greatly reducing the potential extent of groundwater contamination. Level II fugacity model showed that degradation was the dominant removal process except for benzene. In all three biopile systems, the rate of degradation of benzo(a)pyrene was low, requiring more than 12 years for soil concentrations from a spill of about 25 kg (100 mol) to be reduced to a concentration of 0.001 mu g g(-1). The removal time of 1-methylphenanthrene and either anthracene or phenanthrene was about 1 and 3 years, respectively. In contrast, benzene showed the highest degradation rate and was removed after 136 days in all biopile systems. Overall, this study confirms the association of risk critical contaminants with the residual saturation in treated soils and reinforces the importance of accounting for the partitioning behaviour of both NAPL and soil phases during the risk assessment of oil-contaminated sites. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.}",
keywords = "biopiling, bioremediation, fugacity, modelling, organic contaminants, oil",
author = "Pollard, {Simon J. T.} and Hough, {Rupert L.} and Kye-Hoon Kim and Jessica Bellarby and Graeme Paton and Semple, {Kirk T.} and Frederic Coulon",
year = "2008",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.12.007",
language = "English",
volume = "71",
pages = "1432--1439",
journal = "Chemosphere",
issn = "0045-6535",
publisher = "NLM (Medline)",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fugacity modelling to predict the distribution of organic contaminants in the soil: oil matrix of constructed biopiles.

AU - Pollard, Simon J. T.

AU - Hough, Rupert L.

AU - Kim, Kye-Hoon

AU - Bellarby, Jessica

AU - Paton, Graeme

AU - Semple, Kirk T.

AU - Coulon, Frederic

PY - 2008/4

Y1 - 2008/4

N2 - Level I and II fugacity approaches were used to model the environmental distribution of benzene, anthracene, phenanthrene, 1-methylphenanthrene and benzo[a]pyrene in a four phase biopile system, accounting for air, water, mineral soil and non-aqueous phase liquid (oil) phase. The non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) and soil phases were the dominant partition media for the contaminants in each biopile and the contaminants differed markedly in their individual fugacities. Comparison of three soils with different percentage of organic carbon (% org C) showed that the % org C influenced contaminant partitioning behaviour. While benzene showed an aqueous concentration worthy of note for leachate control during biopiling, other organic chemicals showed that insignificant amount of chemicals leached into the water, greatly reducing the potential extent of groundwater contamination. Level II fugacity model showed that degradation was the dominant removal process except for benzene. In all three biopile systems, the rate of degradation of benzo(a)pyrene was low, requiring more than 12 years for soil concentrations from a spill of about 25 kg (100 mol) to be reduced to a concentration of 0.001 mu g g(-1). The removal time of 1-methylphenanthrene and either anthracene or phenanthrene was about 1 and 3 years, respectively. In contrast, benzene showed the highest degradation rate and was removed after 136 days in all biopile systems. Overall, this study confirms the association of risk critical contaminants with the residual saturation in treated soils and reinforces the importance of accounting for the partitioning behaviour of both NAPL and soil phases during the risk assessment of oil-contaminated sites. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.}

AB - Level I and II fugacity approaches were used to model the environmental distribution of benzene, anthracene, phenanthrene, 1-methylphenanthrene and benzo[a]pyrene in a four phase biopile system, accounting for air, water, mineral soil and non-aqueous phase liquid (oil) phase. The non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) and soil phases were the dominant partition media for the contaminants in each biopile and the contaminants differed markedly in their individual fugacities. Comparison of three soils with different percentage of organic carbon (% org C) showed that the % org C influenced contaminant partitioning behaviour. While benzene showed an aqueous concentration worthy of note for leachate control during biopiling, other organic chemicals showed that insignificant amount of chemicals leached into the water, greatly reducing the potential extent of groundwater contamination. Level II fugacity model showed that degradation was the dominant removal process except for benzene. In all three biopile systems, the rate of degradation of benzo(a)pyrene was low, requiring more than 12 years for soil concentrations from a spill of about 25 kg (100 mol) to be reduced to a concentration of 0.001 mu g g(-1). The removal time of 1-methylphenanthrene and either anthracene or phenanthrene was about 1 and 3 years, respectively. In contrast, benzene showed the highest degradation rate and was removed after 136 days in all biopile systems. Overall, this study confirms the association of risk critical contaminants with the residual saturation in treated soils and reinforces the importance of accounting for the partitioning behaviour of both NAPL and soil phases during the risk assessment of oil-contaminated sites. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.}

KW - biopiling

KW - bioremediation

KW - fugacity

KW - modelling

KW - organic contaminants

KW - oil

U2 - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.12.007

DO - 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.12.007

M3 - Journal article

VL - 71

SP - 1432

EP - 1439

JO - Chemosphere

JF - Chemosphere

SN - 0045-6535

IS - 8

ER -