Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Further empirical evidence on popularity and el...

Research

Associated organisational unit

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Further empirical evidence on popularity and electoral cycle effects

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Further empirical evidence on popularity and electoral cycle effects. / Peel, David; Jones, D.
In: Economics Letters, Vol. 23, No. 1, 1987, p. 31-36.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Peel, D & Jones, D 1987, 'Further empirical evidence on popularity and electoral cycle effects', Economics Letters, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(87)90197-2

APA

Peel, D., & Jones, D. (1987). Further empirical evidence on popularity and electoral cycle effects. Economics Letters, 23(1), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1765(87)90197-2

Vancouver

Peel D, Jones D. Further empirical evidence on popularity and electoral cycle effects. Economics Letters. 1987;23(1):31-36. doi: 10.1016/0165-1765(87)90197-2

Author

Peel, David ; Jones, D. / Further empirical evidence on popularity and electoral cycle effects. In: Economics Letters. 1987 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 31-36.

Bibtex

@article{ac5a53dd2ed84444b615e2bddf845c54,
title = "Further empirical evidence on popularity and electoral cycle effects",
abstract = "This paper empirically examines the hypothesis that popularity is typified by {\textquoteleft}electoral cycle effects{\textquoteright}. We suggest that if the data is filtered, on the basis of a model assuming informed voters, there is no evidence for the electoral cycle hypothesis.",
author = "David Peel and D. Jones",
year = "1987",
doi = "10.1016/0165-1765(87)90197-2",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "31--36",
journal = "Economics Letters",
issn = "0165-1765",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Further empirical evidence on popularity and electoral cycle effects

AU - Peel, David

AU - Jones, D.

PY - 1987

Y1 - 1987

N2 - This paper empirically examines the hypothesis that popularity is typified by ‘electoral cycle effects’. We suggest that if the data is filtered, on the basis of a model assuming informed voters, there is no evidence for the electoral cycle hypothesis.

AB - This paper empirically examines the hypothesis that popularity is typified by ‘electoral cycle effects’. We suggest that if the data is filtered, on the basis of a model assuming informed voters, there is no evidence for the electoral cycle hypothesis.

U2 - 10.1016/0165-1765(87)90197-2

DO - 10.1016/0165-1765(87)90197-2

M3 - Journal article

VL - 23

SP - 31

EP - 36

JO - Economics Letters

JF - Economics Letters

SN - 0165-1765

IS - 1

ER -