Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Future novel threats and opportunities facing U...
View graph of relations

Future novel threats and opportunities facing UK biodiversity identified by horizon scanning.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Future novel threats and opportunities facing UK biodiversity identified by horizon scanning. / Sutherland, William J.; Bailey, Mark J.; Bainbridge, Ian P.; Brereton, Tom; Dick, Jaimie T. A.; Drewitt, Joanna; Dulvy, Nicholas K.; Dusic, Nicholas R.; Freckleton, Robert P.; Gaston, Kevin G.; Gilder, Pam M.; Green, Rhys E.; Heathwaite, A. Louise; Johnson, Sally M.; Macdonald, David W.; Mitchell, Roger; Osborn, Daniel; Owen, Roger P.; Pretty, Jules; Prior, Stephanie V.; Prosser, Harvard; Pullin, Andrew S.; Rose, Paul; Stott, Andrew; Tew, Tom; Thomas, Chris D.; Thompson, Des B. A.; Vickery, Juliet A.; Walker, Matt; Walmsley, Clive; Warrington, Stuart; Watkinson, Andrew R.; Williams, Rich J.; Woodroffe, Rosie; Woodroof, Harry J.

In: Journal of Applied Ecology, Vol. 45, No. 3, 06.2008, p. 821-833.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Sutherland, WJ, Bailey, MJ, Bainbridge, IP, Brereton, T, Dick, JTA, Drewitt, J, Dulvy, NK, Dusic, NR, Freckleton, RP, Gaston, KG, Gilder, PM, Green, RE, Heathwaite, AL, Johnson, SM, Macdonald, DW, Mitchell, R, Osborn, D, Owen, RP, Pretty, J, Prior, SV, Prosser, H, Pullin, AS, Rose, P, Stott, A, Tew, T, Thomas, CD, Thompson, DBA, Vickery, JA, Walker, M, Walmsley, C, Warrington, S, Watkinson, AR, Williams, RJ, Woodroffe, R & Woodroof, HJ 2008, 'Future novel threats and opportunities facing UK biodiversity identified by horizon scanning.', Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 821-833. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01474.x

APA

Sutherland, W. J., Bailey, M. J., Bainbridge, I. P., Brereton, T., Dick, J. T. A., Drewitt, J., Dulvy, N. K., Dusic, N. R., Freckleton, R. P., Gaston, K. G., Gilder, P. M., Green, R. E., Heathwaite, A. L., Johnson, S. M., Macdonald, D. W., Mitchell, R., Osborn, D., Owen, R. P., Pretty, J., ... Woodroof, H. J. (2008). Future novel threats and opportunities facing UK biodiversity identified by horizon scanning. Journal of Applied Ecology, 45(3), 821-833. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01474.x

Vancouver

Sutherland WJ, Bailey MJ, Bainbridge IP, Brereton T, Dick JTA, Drewitt J et al. Future novel threats and opportunities facing UK biodiversity identified by horizon scanning. Journal of Applied Ecology. 2008 Jun;45(3):821-833. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01474.x

Author

Sutherland, William J. ; Bailey, Mark J. ; Bainbridge, Ian P. ; Brereton, Tom ; Dick, Jaimie T. A. ; Drewitt, Joanna ; Dulvy, Nicholas K. ; Dusic, Nicholas R. ; Freckleton, Robert P. ; Gaston, Kevin G. ; Gilder, Pam M. ; Green, Rhys E. ; Heathwaite, A. Louise ; Johnson, Sally M. ; Macdonald, David W. ; Mitchell, Roger ; Osborn, Daniel ; Owen, Roger P. ; Pretty, Jules ; Prior, Stephanie V. ; Prosser, Harvard ; Pullin, Andrew S. ; Rose, Paul ; Stott, Andrew ; Tew, Tom ; Thomas, Chris D. ; Thompson, Des B. A. ; Vickery, Juliet A. ; Walker, Matt ; Walmsley, Clive ; Warrington, Stuart ; Watkinson, Andrew R. ; Williams, Rich J. ; Woodroffe, Rosie ; Woodroof, Harry J. / Future novel threats and opportunities facing UK biodiversity identified by horizon scanning. In: Journal of Applied Ecology. 2008 ; Vol. 45, No. 3. pp. 821-833.

Bibtex

@article{86279e55869248b897153c984cab71bd,
title = "Future novel threats and opportunities facing UK biodiversity identified by horizon scanning.",
abstract = "1. Horizon scanning is an essential tool for environmental scientists if they are to contribute to the evidence base for Government, its agencies and other decision makers to devise and implement environmental policies. The implication of not foreseeing issues that are foreseeable is illustrated by the contentious responses to genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops in the UK, and by challenges surrounding biofuels, foot and mouth disease, avian influenza and climate change. 2. A total of 35 representatives from organizations involved in environmental policy, academia, scientific journalism and horizon scanning were asked to use wide consultation to identify the future novel or step changes in threats to, and opportunities for, biodiversity that might arise in the UK up to 2050, but that had not been important in the recent past. At least 452 people were consulted. 3. Cases for 195 submitted issues were distributed to all participants for comments and additions. All issues were scored (probability, hazard, novelty and overall score) prior to a 2-day workshop. Shortlisting to 41 issues and then the final 25 issues, together with refinement of these issues, took place at the workshop during another two rounds of discussion and scoring. 4. We provide summaries of the 25 shortlisted issues and outline the research needs. 5. We suggest that horizon scanning incorporating wide consultation with providers and users of environmental science is used by environmental policy makers and researchers. This can be used to identify gaps in knowledge and policy, and to identify future key issues for biodiversity, including those arising from outside the domains of ecology and biodiversity. 6. Synthesis and applications. Horizon scanning can be used by environmental policy makers and researchers to identify gaps in knowledge and policy. Drawing on the experience, expertise and research of policy advisors, academics and journalists, this exercise helps set the agenda for policy, practice and research.",
keywords = "conservation • conservation policy • decision making • environmental risk • nanotechnology",
author = "Sutherland, {William J.} and Bailey, {Mark J.} and Bainbridge, {Ian P.} and Tom Brereton and Dick, {Jaimie T. A.} and Joanna Drewitt and Dulvy, {Nicholas K.} and Dusic, {Nicholas R.} and Freckleton, {Robert P.} and Gaston, {Kevin G.} and Gilder, {Pam M.} and Green, {Rhys E.} and Heathwaite, {A. Louise} and Johnson, {Sally M.} and Macdonald, {David W.} and Roger Mitchell and Daniel Osborn and Owen, {Roger P.} and Jules Pretty and Prior, {Stephanie V.} and Harvard Prosser and Pullin, {Andrew S.} and Paul Rose and Andrew Stott and Tom Tew and Thomas, {Chris D.} and Thompson, {Des B. A.} and Vickery, {Juliet A.} and Matt Walker and Clive Walmsley and Stuart Warrington and Watkinson, {Andrew R.} and Williams, {Rich J.} and Rosie Woodroffe and Woodroof, {Harry J.}",
year = "2008",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01474.x",
language = "English",
volume = "45",
pages = "821--833",
journal = "Journal of Applied Ecology",
issn = "0021-8901",
publisher = "Blackwell Publishing Ltd",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Future novel threats and opportunities facing UK biodiversity identified by horizon scanning.

AU - Sutherland, William J.

AU - Bailey, Mark J.

AU - Bainbridge, Ian P.

AU - Brereton, Tom

AU - Dick, Jaimie T. A.

AU - Drewitt, Joanna

AU - Dulvy, Nicholas K.

AU - Dusic, Nicholas R.

AU - Freckleton, Robert P.

AU - Gaston, Kevin G.

AU - Gilder, Pam M.

AU - Green, Rhys E.

AU - Heathwaite, A. Louise

AU - Johnson, Sally M.

AU - Macdonald, David W.

AU - Mitchell, Roger

AU - Osborn, Daniel

AU - Owen, Roger P.

AU - Pretty, Jules

AU - Prior, Stephanie V.

AU - Prosser, Harvard

AU - Pullin, Andrew S.

AU - Rose, Paul

AU - Stott, Andrew

AU - Tew, Tom

AU - Thomas, Chris D.

AU - Thompson, Des B. A.

AU - Vickery, Juliet A.

AU - Walker, Matt

AU - Walmsley, Clive

AU - Warrington, Stuart

AU - Watkinson, Andrew R.

AU - Williams, Rich J.

AU - Woodroffe, Rosie

AU - Woodroof, Harry J.

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - 1. Horizon scanning is an essential tool for environmental scientists if they are to contribute to the evidence base for Government, its agencies and other decision makers to devise and implement environmental policies. The implication of not foreseeing issues that are foreseeable is illustrated by the contentious responses to genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops in the UK, and by challenges surrounding biofuels, foot and mouth disease, avian influenza and climate change. 2. A total of 35 representatives from organizations involved in environmental policy, academia, scientific journalism and horizon scanning were asked to use wide consultation to identify the future novel or step changes in threats to, and opportunities for, biodiversity that might arise in the UK up to 2050, but that had not been important in the recent past. At least 452 people were consulted. 3. Cases for 195 submitted issues were distributed to all participants for comments and additions. All issues were scored (probability, hazard, novelty and overall score) prior to a 2-day workshop. Shortlisting to 41 issues and then the final 25 issues, together with refinement of these issues, took place at the workshop during another two rounds of discussion and scoring. 4. We provide summaries of the 25 shortlisted issues and outline the research needs. 5. We suggest that horizon scanning incorporating wide consultation with providers and users of environmental science is used by environmental policy makers and researchers. This can be used to identify gaps in knowledge and policy, and to identify future key issues for biodiversity, including those arising from outside the domains of ecology and biodiversity. 6. Synthesis and applications. Horizon scanning can be used by environmental policy makers and researchers to identify gaps in knowledge and policy. Drawing on the experience, expertise and research of policy advisors, academics and journalists, this exercise helps set the agenda for policy, practice and research.

AB - 1. Horizon scanning is an essential tool for environmental scientists if they are to contribute to the evidence base for Government, its agencies and other decision makers to devise and implement environmental policies. The implication of not foreseeing issues that are foreseeable is illustrated by the contentious responses to genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops in the UK, and by challenges surrounding biofuels, foot and mouth disease, avian influenza and climate change. 2. A total of 35 representatives from organizations involved in environmental policy, academia, scientific journalism and horizon scanning were asked to use wide consultation to identify the future novel or step changes in threats to, and opportunities for, biodiversity that might arise in the UK up to 2050, but that had not been important in the recent past. At least 452 people were consulted. 3. Cases for 195 submitted issues were distributed to all participants for comments and additions. All issues were scored (probability, hazard, novelty and overall score) prior to a 2-day workshop. Shortlisting to 41 issues and then the final 25 issues, together with refinement of these issues, took place at the workshop during another two rounds of discussion and scoring. 4. We provide summaries of the 25 shortlisted issues and outline the research needs. 5. We suggest that horizon scanning incorporating wide consultation with providers and users of environmental science is used by environmental policy makers and researchers. This can be used to identify gaps in knowledge and policy, and to identify future key issues for biodiversity, including those arising from outside the domains of ecology and biodiversity. 6. Synthesis and applications. Horizon scanning can be used by environmental policy makers and researchers to identify gaps in knowledge and policy. Drawing on the experience, expertise and research of policy advisors, academics and journalists, this exercise helps set the agenda for policy, practice and research.

KW - conservation • conservation policy • decision making • environmental risk • nanotechnology

U2 - 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01474.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01474.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 45

SP - 821

EP - 833

JO - Journal of Applied Ecology

JF - Journal of Applied Ecology

SN - 0021-8901

IS - 3

ER -