We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK


97% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Gaps, barriers and conceptual chasms: theories ...
View graph of relations

« Back

Gaps, barriers and conceptual chasms: theories of technology transfer and energy in buildings

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article


<mark>Journal publication date</mark>12/1998
<mark>Journal</mark>Energy Policy
Number of pages8
<mark>Original language</mark>English


Having shown how much energy might be saved through the use of economically worthwhile measures and technologies, researchers and policy makers then find themselves trying to close the gap between current practice and recognised technical potential. The ensuing process of technology transfer is often seen as a process of overcoming 'non technical barriers' which inhibit the realisation of proven technical potential. This familiar approach depends upon a strong conceptual distinction between the social, on the one hand, and the technical, on the other, But does it make sense to talk of technical potential in the abstract? Do people really have technologies 'transferred' upon them? Drawing upon ideas from the sociology of science and technology and on recent research funded by Britain's Economic and Social Research Council, this paper unpacks conventional beliefs about the diffusion of energy efficient technologies and suggests an alternative approach which acknowledges the social structuring of technical innovation. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.