Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Genetically modified organisms in agriculture :...
View graph of relations

Genetically modified organisms in agriculture : can regulations work?

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Genetically modified organisms in agriculture : can regulations work? / Kothamasi, David; Vermeylen, Saskia.
In: Environment, Development and Sustainability, Vol. 13, No. 3, 06.2011, p. 535-546.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

Kothamasi, D & Vermeylen, S 2011, 'Genetically modified organisms in agriculture : can regulations work?', Environment, Development and Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 535-546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-010-9275-3

APA

Vancouver

Kothamasi D, Vermeylen S. Genetically modified organisms in agriculture : can regulations work? Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2011 Jun;13(3):535-546. doi: 10.1007/s10668-010-9275-3

Author

Kothamasi, David ; Vermeylen, Saskia. / Genetically modified organisms in agriculture : can regulations work?. In: Environment, Development and Sustainability. 2011 ; Vol. 13, No. 3. pp. 535-546.

Bibtex

@article{d8c2dba0b43646cc9be94079fcf6e379,
title = "Genetically modified organisms in agriculture : can regulations work?",
abstract = "Genetically modified (GM) crops have been recognised to be economically beneficial to subsistence farmers and have been projected as essential tools for addressing challenges in hunger, environmental sustainability and international development. Yet the uncertainty of their effects on human health and the undesirable ecological consequences of these organisms have raised concerns on the rapid pace of their production. Regulating the release of these organisms is a critical environmental issue. The Cartagena protocol on bio-safety, the principle legal arrangement for the regulation of these organisms, has ratifications from only 157 countries and has proven to be a weak regulator. Countries like India and Brazil have seen the proliferation of unapproved stealth GM varieties which make regulation even more difficult. In this paper, we explore the debate surrounding the introduction of GM organisms and analyse the effectiveness of existing legal regimes to regulate their use.",
keywords = "Genetically modified organisms - Bt-cotton - Cartagena protocol on bio-safety - Intellectual property rights - Stealth seeds",
author = "David Kothamasi and Saskia Vermeylen",
year = "2011",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1007/s10668-010-9275-3",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "535--546",
journal = "Environment, Development and Sustainability",
issn = "1387-585X",
publisher = "Springer Netherlands",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Genetically modified organisms in agriculture : can regulations work?

AU - Kothamasi, David

AU - Vermeylen, Saskia

PY - 2011/6

Y1 - 2011/6

N2 - Genetically modified (GM) crops have been recognised to be economically beneficial to subsistence farmers and have been projected as essential tools for addressing challenges in hunger, environmental sustainability and international development. Yet the uncertainty of their effects on human health and the undesirable ecological consequences of these organisms have raised concerns on the rapid pace of their production. Regulating the release of these organisms is a critical environmental issue. The Cartagena protocol on bio-safety, the principle legal arrangement for the regulation of these organisms, has ratifications from only 157 countries and has proven to be a weak regulator. Countries like India and Brazil have seen the proliferation of unapproved stealth GM varieties which make regulation even more difficult. In this paper, we explore the debate surrounding the introduction of GM organisms and analyse the effectiveness of existing legal regimes to regulate their use.

AB - Genetically modified (GM) crops have been recognised to be economically beneficial to subsistence farmers and have been projected as essential tools for addressing challenges in hunger, environmental sustainability and international development. Yet the uncertainty of their effects on human health and the undesirable ecological consequences of these organisms have raised concerns on the rapid pace of their production. Regulating the release of these organisms is a critical environmental issue. The Cartagena protocol on bio-safety, the principle legal arrangement for the regulation of these organisms, has ratifications from only 157 countries and has proven to be a weak regulator. Countries like India and Brazil have seen the proliferation of unapproved stealth GM varieties which make regulation even more difficult. In this paper, we explore the debate surrounding the introduction of GM organisms and analyse the effectiveness of existing legal regimes to regulate their use.

KW - Genetically modified organisms - Bt-cotton - Cartagena protocol on bio-safety - Intellectual property rights - Stealth seeds

U2 - 10.1007/s10668-010-9275-3

DO - 10.1007/s10668-010-9275-3

M3 - Journal article

VL - 13

SP - 535

EP - 546

JO - Environment, Development and Sustainability

JF - Environment, Development and Sustainability

SN - 1387-585X

IS - 3

ER -