Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Design Journal on 31/05/2019, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14606925.2019.1595398
Accepted author manuscript, 637 KB, PDF document
Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
Final published version
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Geographical Context Influence on Codesign Practice Between Indonesia and the UK Context
AU - Setiawan, Andi
AU - Dunn, Nick
AU - Cruickshank, Leon
N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Design Journal on 31/05/2019, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14606925.2019.1595398
PY - 2019/5/31
Y1 - 2019/5/31
N2 - This paper describes and evaluates experiences of co-design practice fromtwo different contexts, Indonesia and the UK. It draws on multiple case studiesconsisting of three co-design projects in each context. The focus of discussion is to better understand the influence of the geographical context on the application of co-design and how it informs the characteristics of the co-design practice. This comparison of practices in both contexts has been conducted through examination of their respective processes in relation established criteria. The study in the Indonesian context finds notable effectiveness in its support for collaboration and flexibility, while the decision-making process appear less democratic. By contrast, in the UK context effectiveness is identifiable in almost all aspects of the process. The paper concludes with a discussion of the similarities and differences in the characteristics of co-design in both contexts.
AB - This paper describes and evaluates experiences of co-design practice fromtwo different contexts, Indonesia and the UK. It draws on multiple case studiesconsisting of three co-design projects in each context. The focus of discussion is to better understand the influence of the geographical context on the application of co-design and how it informs the characteristics of the co-design practice. This comparison of practices in both contexts has been conducted through examination of their respective processes in relation established criteria. The study in the Indonesian context finds notable effectiveness in its support for collaboration and flexibility, while the decision-making process appear less democratic. By contrast, in the UK context effectiveness is identifiable in almost all aspects of the process. The paper concludes with a discussion of the similarities and differences in the characteristics of co-design in both contexts.
U2 - 10.1080/14606925.2019.1595398
DO - 10.1080/14606925.2019.1595398
M3 - Journal article
VL - 22
SP - 763
EP - 776
JO - The Design Journal
JF - The Design Journal
SN - 1460-6925
IS - Suppl. 1
ER -