Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Geographical Context Influence on Codesign Prac...

Electronic data

  • EAD_accepted

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Design Journal on 31/05/2019, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14606925.2019.1595398

    Accepted author manuscript, 637 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Geographical Context Influence on Codesign Practice Between Indonesia and the UK Context

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Geographical Context Influence on Codesign Practice Between Indonesia and the UK Context. / Setiawan, Andi; Dunn, Nick; Cruickshank, Leon.
In: The Design Journal, Vol. 22, No. Suppl. 1, 31.05.2019, p. 763-776.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Setiawan A, Dunn N, Cruickshank L. Geographical Context Influence on Codesign Practice Between Indonesia and the UK Context. The Design Journal. 2019 May 31;22(Suppl. 1):763-776. doi: 10.1080/14606925.2019.1595398

Author

Bibtex

@article{e7c86fc0e6a84a74a68b6f806f63abf6,
title = "Geographical Context Influence on Codesign Practice Between Indonesia and the UK Context",
abstract = "This paper describes and evaluates experiences of co-design practice fromtwo different contexts, Indonesia and the UK. It draws on multiple case studiesconsisting of three co-design projects in each context. The focus of discussion is to better understand the influence of the geographical context on the application of co-design and how it informs the characteristics of the co-design practice. This comparison of practices in both contexts has been conducted through examination of their respective processes in relation established criteria. The study in the Indonesian context finds notable effectiveness in its support for collaboration and flexibility, while the decision-making process appear less democratic. By contrast, in the UK context effectiveness is identifiable in almost all aspects of the process. The paper concludes with a discussion of the similarities and differences in the characteristics of co-design in both contexts. ",
author = "Andi Setiawan and Nick Dunn and Leon Cruickshank",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Design Journal on 31/05/2019, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14606925.2019.1595398",
year = "2019",
month = may,
day = "31",
doi = "10.1080/14606925.2019.1595398",
language = "English",
volume = "22",
pages = "763--776",
journal = "The Design Journal",
issn = "1460-6925",
publisher = "ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD",
number = "Suppl. 1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Geographical Context Influence on Codesign Practice Between Indonesia and the UK Context

AU - Setiawan, Andi

AU - Dunn, Nick

AU - Cruickshank, Leon

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Design Journal on 31/05/2019, available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14606925.2019.1595398

PY - 2019/5/31

Y1 - 2019/5/31

N2 - This paper describes and evaluates experiences of co-design practice fromtwo different contexts, Indonesia and the UK. It draws on multiple case studiesconsisting of three co-design projects in each context. The focus of discussion is to better understand the influence of the geographical context on the application of co-design and how it informs the characteristics of the co-design practice. This comparison of practices in both contexts has been conducted through examination of their respective processes in relation established criteria. The study in the Indonesian context finds notable effectiveness in its support for collaboration and flexibility, while the decision-making process appear less democratic. By contrast, in the UK context effectiveness is identifiable in almost all aspects of the process. The paper concludes with a discussion of the similarities and differences in the characteristics of co-design in both contexts.

AB - This paper describes and evaluates experiences of co-design practice fromtwo different contexts, Indonesia and the UK. It draws on multiple case studiesconsisting of three co-design projects in each context. The focus of discussion is to better understand the influence of the geographical context on the application of co-design and how it informs the characteristics of the co-design practice. This comparison of practices in both contexts has been conducted through examination of their respective processes in relation established criteria. The study in the Indonesian context finds notable effectiveness in its support for collaboration and flexibility, while the decision-making process appear less democratic. By contrast, in the UK context effectiveness is identifiable in almost all aspects of the process. The paper concludes with a discussion of the similarities and differences in the characteristics of co-design in both contexts.

U2 - 10.1080/14606925.2019.1595398

DO - 10.1080/14606925.2019.1595398

M3 - Journal article

VL - 22

SP - 763

EP - 776

JO - The Design Journal

JF - The Design Journal

SN - 1460-6925

IS - Suppl. 1

ER -