Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Geophysical Prospection for Late Holocene Buria...

Electronic data

Links

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Geophysical Prospection for Late Holocene Burials in Coastal Environments: Possibilities and Problems from a Pilot Study in South Australia

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Standard

Geophysical Prospection for Late Holocene Burials in Coastal Environments : Possibilities and Problems from a Pilot Study in South Australia. / Moffat, I; Wallis, L.A.; Hounslow, Mark; Niland, K.; Domett, K.; Trevorrow, G.

In: Geoarchaeology, Vol. 25, No. 5, 09.2010, p. 645-665.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Author

Moffat, I ; Wallis, L.A. ; Hounslow, Mark ; Niland, K. ; Domett, K. ; Trevorrow, G. / Geophysical Prospection for Late Holocene Burials in Coastal Environments : Possibilities and Problems from a Pilot Study in South Australia. In: Geoarchaeology. 2010 ; Vol. 25, No. 5. pp. 645-665.

Bibtex

@article{10e8d659bde648beb3ab873b8656b60d,
title = "Geophysical Prospection for Late Holocene Burials in Coastal Environments: Possibilities and Problems from a Pilot Study in South Australia",
abstract = "Geophysical techniques have been widely employed for the noninvasive location of burial sites in archaeological and forensic investigations. This approach has met with varying degrees of success, depending on factors such as equipment choice, survey methodology, burial type, and geological setting. This paper reports the results of a multitechnique geophysical survey carried out immediately prior to the salvage excavation of two Indigenous burials from an eolian dune in coastal South Australia. Ground-penetrating radar was not successful in defining the location of the burials owing to the disturbed nature of the local stratigraphy. Magnetic field intensity and apparent magnetic susceptibility surveys identified discrete anomalies that coincided with the location of skeletal material revealed during excavation, which we hypothesize to be due to burning or ochre use during funerary practices. Despite the spatial association of these features, subsequent laboratory analyses of the mineralogy and magnetic properties of sediments collected from the site failed to find a definite cause of the anomalies. Nevertheless, the association between them and the primary interment locations has implications for archaeological surveys carried out in the Australian coastal zone, as it highlights the potential of magnetic field intensity and apparent magnetic susceptibility geophysical techniques undertaken with a more refined survey methodology to afford a noninvasive, culturally appropriate means through which to detect Indigenous burials. This approach may prove particularly useful in areas with disturbed stratigraphy where ground-penetrating radar is less effective. {\textcopyright} 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.",
author = "I Moffat and L.A. Wallis and Mark Hounslow and K. Niland and K. Domett and G. Trevorrow",
year = "2010",
month = sep
doi = "10.1002/gea.20321",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "645--665",
journal = "Geoarchaeology",
issn = "0883-6353",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Geophysical Prospection for Late Holocene Burials in Coastal Environments

T2 - Possibilities and Problems from a Pilot Study in South Australia

AU - Moffat, I

AU - Wallis, L.A.

AU - Hounslow, Mark

AU - Niland, K.

AU - Domett, K.

AU - Trevorrow, G.

PY - 2010/9

Y1 - 2010/9

N2 - Geophysical techniques have been widely employed for the noninvasive location of burial sites in archaeological and forensic investigations. This approach has met with varying degrees of success, depending on factors such as equipment choice, survey methodology, burial type, and geological setting. This paper reports the results of a multitechnique geophysical survey carried out immediately prior to the salvage excavation of two Indigenous burials from an eolian dune in coastal South Australia. Ground-penetrating radar was not successful in defining the location of the burials owing to the disturbed nature of the local stratigraphy. Magnetic field intensity and apparent magnetic susceptibility surveys identified discrete anomalies that coincided with the location of skeletal material revealed during excavation, which we hypothesize to be due to burning or ochre use during funerary practices. Despite the spatial association of these features, subsequent laboratory analyses of the mineralogy and magnetic properties of sediments collected from the site failed to find a definite cause of the anomalies. Nevertheless, the association between them and the primary interment locations has implications for archaeological surveys carried out in the Australian coastal zone, as it highlights the potential of magnetic field intensity and apparent magnetic susceptibility geophysical techniques undertaken with a more refined survey methodology to afford a noninvasive, culturally appropriate means through which to detect Indigenous burials. This approach may prove particularly useful in areas with disturbed stratigraphy where ground-penetrating radar is less effective. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

AB - Geophysical techniques have been widely employed for the noninvasive location of burial sites in archaeological and forensic investigations. This approach has met with varying degrees of success, depending on factors such as equipment choice, survey methodology, burial type, and geological setting. This paper reports the results of a multitechnique geophysical survey carried out immediately prior to the salvage excavation of two Indigenous burials from an eolian dune in coastal South Australia. Ground-penetrating radar was not successful in defining the location of the burials owing to the disturbed nature of the local stratigraphy. Magnetic field intensity and apparent magnetic susceptibility surveys identified discrete anomalies that coincided with the location of skeletal material revealed during excavation, which we hypothesize to be due to burning or ochre use during funerary practices. Despite the spatial association of these features, subsequent laboratory analyses of the mineralogy and magnetic properties of sediments collected from the site failed to find a definite cause of the anomalies. Nevertheless, the association between them and the primary interment locations has implications for archaeological surveys carried out in the Australian coastal zone, as it highlights the potential of magnetic field intensity and apparent magnetic susceptibility geophysical techniques undertaken with a more refined survey methodology to afford a noninvasive, culturally appropriate means through which to detect Indigenous burials. This approach may prove particularly useful in areas with disturbed stratigraphy where ground-penetrating radar is less effective. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

U2 - 10.1002/gea.20321

DO - 10.1002/gea.20321

M3 - Journal article

VL - 25

SP - 645

EP - 665

JO - Geoarchaeology

JF - Geoarchaeology

SN - 0883-6353

IS - 5

ER -