Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Get Over Your (Legal) 'Self': A Brief History o...
View graph of relations

Get Over Your (Legal) 'Self': A Brief History of Lesbians, Motherhood and the Law.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Get Over Your (Legal) 'Self': A Brief History of Lesbians, Motherhood and the Law. / Beresford, Sarah.
In: Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, Vol. 30, No. 2, 06.2008, p. 95-106.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Beresford S. Get Over Your (Legal) 'Self': A Brief History of Lesbians, Motherhood and the Law. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 2008 Jun;30(2):95-106. doi: 10.1080/09649060802469785

Author

Beresford, Sarah. / Get Over Your (Legal) 'Self': A Brief History of Lesbians, Motherhood and the Law. In: Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 2008 ; Vol. 30, No. 2. pp. 95-106.

Bibtex

@article{951ab95c121745d1b9ebd72ddd556ccd,
title = "Get Over Your (Legal) 'Self': A Brief History of Lesbians, Motherhood and the Law.",
abstract = "Law and legal judgments tell a story. However, this article is not about the story of the litigants. It is, rather, an exploration of how legal judgments are an act of discourse and thus are about an identity creation of the legal {\textquoteleft}self{\textquoteright}. Legal discourse continues to create categories of legal relevance that are used to arrive at essentialist identities which construct the body of the subject. This article argues that this continues to be the case, notwithstanding certain aspects of law reform, recent case law, and resistance to assimilative discourse (Butler 2004). In some small way, the aim of this article is {\textquoteleft}to disrupt what has become settled knowledge and knowable reality{\textquoteright} and to do something {\textquoteleft}other than a simple assimilation into prevailing norms{\textquoteright} (Butler 2004, pp. 27). It asks law to give an account of its {\textquoteleft}self{\textquoteright}. I will do this within the context of family law, by examining some of {\textquoteleft}old{\textquoteright} case law from the early 1970s and comparing those judgments with more recent case law. I want to ask: what has changed in the intervening years?",
keywords = "discourse, family, identity, lesbian, gender",
author = "Sarah Beresford",
year = "2008",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1080/09649060802469785",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "95--106",
journal = "Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law",
issn = "0964-9069",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Get Over Your (Legal) 'Self': A Brief History of Lesbians, Motherhood and the Law.

AU - Beresford, Sarah

PY - 2008/6

Y1 - 2008/6

N2 - Law and legal judgments tell a story. However, this article is not about the story of the litigants. It is, rather, an exploration of how legal judgments are an act of discourse and thus are about an identity creation of the legal ‘self’. Legal discourse continues to create categories of legal relevance that are used to arrive at essentialist identities which construct the body of the subject. This article argues that this continues to be the case, notwithstanding certain aspects of law reform, recent case law, and resistance to assimilative discourse (Butler 2004). In some small way, the aim of this article is ‘to disrupt what has become settled knowledge and knowable reality’ and to do something ‘other than a simple assimilation into prevailing norms’ (Butler 2004, pp. 27). It asks law to give an account of its ‘self’. I will do this within the context of family law, by examining some of ‘old’ case law from the early 1970s and comparing those judgments with more recent case law. I want to ask: what has changed in the intervening years?

AB - Law and legal judgments tell a story. However, this article is not about the story of the litigants. It is, rather, an exploration of how legal judgments are an act of discourse and thus are about an identity creation of the legal ‘self’. Legal discourse continues to create categories of legal relevance that are used to arrive at essentialist identities which construct the body of the subject. This article argues that this continues to be the case, notwithstanding certain aspects of law reform, recent case law, and resistance to assimilative discourse (Butler 2004). In some small way, the aim of this article is ‘to disrupt what has become settled knowledge and knowable reality’ and to do something ‘other than a simple assimilation into prevailing norms’ (Butler 2004, pp. 27). It asks law to give an account of its ‘self’. I will do this within the context of family law, by examining some of ‘old’ case law from the early 1970s and comparing those judgments with more recent case law. I want to ask: what has changed in the intervening years?

KW - discourse

KW - family

KW - identity

KW - lesbian

KW - gender

U2 - 10.1080/09649060802469785

DO - 10.1080/09649060802469785

M3 - Journal article

VL - 30

SP - 95

EP - 106

JO - Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law

JF - Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law

SN - 0964-9069

IS - 2

ER -