12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Glucose administration prior to a divided atten...
View graph of relations

« Back

Glucose administration prior to a divided attention task improves tracking performance but not word recognition : evidence against differential memory enhancement?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Journal publication date01/2009
JournalPsychopharmacology
Journal number1-3
Volume202
Number of pages10
Pages549-558
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Rationale The cognition-enhancing effects of glucose administration to humans have been well-documented; however, it remains unclear whether this effect preferentially targets episodic memory or other cognitive domains. Objectives The effect of glucose on the allocation of attentional resources during memory encoding was assessed using a sensitive dual-attention paradigm. Materials and methods One hundred and twenty volunteers (mean age 21.60, SD 4.89, 77 females) took part in this randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel groups study where each consumed a 25-g glucose drink or a placebo. Half of the participants in each drink condition attempted to track a moving on-screen target during auditory word presentation. The distance between the cursor and the tracking target was used as an index of attentional cost during encoding. Effects of drink and tracking on recognition memory and drink on tracking performance were assessed. Self-rated appetite and mood were co-monitored. Results Co-performing the tracking task significantly impaired memory performance irrespective of drink condition. In the placebo–tracking condition, there was a cost to tracking manifest as greater deviation from target during and immediately following word presentation. Compared with placebo, the glucose drink significantly improved tracking performance during encoding. There were significant time-related changes in thirst and alertness ratings but these were not differentially affected by drink or tracking conditions. Conclusion Tracking but not memory was enhanced by glucose. This finding suggests that, under certain task conditions, glucose administrations does not preferentially enhance memory performance. One mechanism through which glucose acts as a cognition enhancer is through allowing greater allocation of attentional resources.

Bibliographic note

The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com