Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Government policy and credibility: a criticism ...
View graph of relations

Government policy and credibility: a criticism of a class of rational expectations models

Research output: Working paper

Published

Standard

Government policy and credibility: a criticism of a class of rational expectations models. / Whittaker, John; Walker, Paul E.
Lancaster: The Department of Economics, 1997. (Economics Discussion Paper Series).

Research output: Working paper

Harvard

Whittaker, J & Walker, PE 1997 'Government policy and credibility: a criticism of a class of rational expectations models' Economics Discussion Paper Series, The Department of Economics, Lancaster.

APA

Whittaker, J., & Walker, P. E. (1997). Government policy and credibility: a criticism of a class of rational expectations models. (Economics Discussion Paper Series). The Department of Economics.

Vancouver

Whittaker J, Walker PE. Government policy and credibility: a criticism of a class of rational expectations models. Lancaster: The Department of Economics. 1997 Jul. (Economics Discussion Paper Series).

Author

Whittaker, John ; Walker, Paul E. / Government policy and credibility: a criticism of a class of rational expectations models. Lancaster : The Department of Economics, 1997. (Economics Discussion Paper Series).

Bibtex

@techreport{cb597e33613c4d1dac5dc87a184e35ba,
title = "Government policy and credibility: a criticism of a class of rational expectations models",
abstract = "This paper challenges the logical consistency of the Barro and Gordon (1983) type of model of policy credibility, in which agents have 'trigger strategy' expectations of policy. It is shown that optimal policy is to 'cheat' by announcing low inflation whilst pursuing high inflation. This implies that the trigger mechanism is incompatible with rational expectations and there are no equilibria that simultaneously satisfy all the model assumptions. Finally, following a review of rational expectations models, it is suggested that policy credibility can be adequately described by a model in which expectations are adaptive, without regard for whether they are also rational.",
author = "John Whittaker and Walker, {Paul E}",
year = "1997",
month = jul,
language = "English",
series = "Economics Discussion Paper Series",
publisher = "The Department of Economics",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "The Department of Economics",

}

RIS

TY - UNPB

T1 - Government policy and credibility: a criticism of a class of rational expectations models

AU - Whittaker, John

AU - Walker, Paul E

PY - 1997/7

Y1 - 1997/7

N2 - This paper challenges the logical consistency of the Barro and Gordon (1983) type of model of policy credibility, in which agents have 'trigger strategy' expectations of policy. It is shown that optimal policy is to 'cheat' by announcing low inflation whilst pursuing high inflation. This implies that the trigger mechanism is incompatible with rational expectations and there are no equilibria that simultaneously satisfy all the model assumptions. Finally, following a review of rational expectations models, it is suggested that policy credibility can be adequately described by a model in which expectations are adaptive, without regard for whether they are also rational.

AB - This paper challenges the logical consistency of the Barro and Gordon (1983) type of model of policy credibility, in which agents have 'trigger strategy' expectations of policy. It is shown that optimal policy is to 'cheat' by announcing low inflation whilst pursuing high inflation. This implies that the trigger mechanism is incompatible with rational expectations and there are no equilibria that simultaneously satisfy all the model assumptions. Finally, following a review of rational expectations models, it is suggested that policy credibility can be adequately described by a model in which expectations are adaptive, without regard for whether they are also rational.

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Economics Discussion Paper Series

BT - Government policy and credibility: a criticism of a class of rational expectations models

PB - The Department of Economics

CY - Lancaster

ER -