12,000

We have over 12,000 students, from over 100 countries, within one of the safest campuses in the UK

93%

93% of Lancaster students go into work or further study within six months of graduating

Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Group sequential tests for delayed responses
View graph of relations

« Back

Group sequential tests for delayed responses

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Published

Journal publication date01/2013
JournalJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology)
Journal number1
Volume75
Number of pages52
Pages3-54
Early online date4/12/12
Original languageEnglish

Abstract

Group sequential methods are used routinely to monitor clinical trials and to provide early stopping when there is evidence of a treatment effect, lack of an effect, or concerns about patient safety. In many studies, the response of clinical interest is measured some time after the start of treatment and there are subjects at each interim analysis who have been treated but are yet to respond. We formulate a new form of group sequential test which gives a proper treatment of these "pipeline" subjects; these tests can be applied even when the continued accrual of data after the decision to stop the trial is unexpected. We illustrate our methods through a series of examples. We define error spending versions of these new designs which handle unpredictable group sizes and provide an information monitoring framework that can accommodate nuisance parameters, such as an unknown response variance. By studying optimal versions of our new designs, we show how the benefits of lower expected sample size normally achieved by a group sequential test are reduced when there is a delay in response. The loss of efficiency for larger delays can be ameliorated by incorporating data on a correlated short-term endpoint, fitting a joint model for the two endpoints but still making inferences on the original, longer term endpoint. We derive p-values and confidence intervals on termination of our new tests.

Bibliographic note

This is a post-print of an article published in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 75 (1), 2013. (c) Wiley.

Related research outputs