Accepted author manuscript, 469 KB, PDF document
Final published version
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review
Research output: Contribution in Book/Report/Proceedings - With ISBN/ISSN › Conference contribution/Paper › peer-review
}
TY - GEN
T1 - HCI policy and the smart city
AU - Wang, Ding
PY - 2016/11/4
Y1 - 2016/11/4
N2 - While the idea of the ‘Smart City’ has attracted increasing attention from academia, industry, andgovernment this interest has largely had a technical and technological focus. This paper identifiessome of the important political and policy challenges facing the idea, the discourse, of a ‘smart city’ as a means to optimise HCI input into the ‘smart city’ debate. It then addresses that gap by detailing a research project that explored how experts in smart city research and development in the UK context responded to this policy challenge. Experts were asked questions regarding their prior experience with the “smart city”, their understandings of what it means for a city to be smart, and what policy potentials they've recognised in the smart city. The paper analyses and offers asynthesis of the responses collected throughout the research with the current policies concerningvarious smart city proximity, thereby providing a critical assessment of the values underlying thesmart city. The paper aims to explore and present some of the policy possibilities for UK smart cities that are potentially useful for politicians, policy makers, planners, academics, and technologycompanies. I believe that these perspectives for policy development can be used to informresponsible development, spatially and socially inclusive technologies, and ultimately more resilient and liveable cities.
AB - While the idea of the ‘Smart City’ has attracted increasing attention from academia, industry, andgovernment this interest has largely had a technical and technological focus. This paper identifiessome of the important political and policy challenges facing the idea, the discourse, of a ‘smart city’ as a means to optimise HCI input into the ‘smart city’ debate. It then addresses that gap by detailing a research project that explored how experts in smart city research and development in the UK context responded to this policy challenge. Experts were asked questions regarding their prior experience with the “smart city”, their understandings of what it means for a city to be smart, and what policy potentials they've recognised in the smart city. The paper analyses and offers asynthesis of the responses collected throughout the research with the current policies concerningvarious smart city proximity, thereby providing a critical assessment of the values underlying thesmart city. The paper aims to explore and present some of the policy possibilities for UK smart cities that are potentially useful for politicians, policy makers, planners, academics, and technologycompanies. I believe that these perspectives for policy development can be used to informresponsible development, spatially and socially inclusive technologies, and ultimately more resilient and liveable cities.
KW - Smart Cities
KW - Policy
KW - HCI
U2 - 10.14236/ewic/HCI2016.35
DO - 10.14236/ewic/HCI2016.35
M3 - Conference contribution/Paper
BT - Proceedings of British HCI 2016 Conference Fusion, Bournemouth, UK
PB - BCS Learning and Development Limited
ER -