Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Hegel, Naturalism and the Philosophy of Nature

Text available via DOI:

View graph of relations

Hegel, Naturalism and the Philosophy of Nature

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Published

Standard

Hegel, Naturalism and the Philosophy of Nature. / Stone, Alison.
In: Hegel Bulletin, Vol. 34, No. 1, 05.2013, p. 59-78.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/MagazineJournal articlepeer-review

Harvard

APA

Vancouver

Stone A. Hegel, Naturalism and the Philosophy of Nature. Hegel Bulletin. 2013 May;34(1):59-78. doi: 10.1017/hgl.2013.2

Author

Stone, Alison. / Hegel, Naturalism and the Philosophy of Nature. In: Hegel Bulletin. 2013 ; Vol. 34, No. 1. pp. 59-78.

Bibtex

@article{158a58337831489bbfe1aca49e95b498,
title = "Hegel, Naturalism and the Philosophy of Nature",
abstract = "In this article I consider whether Hegel is a naturalist or an anti-naturalist with respect to his philosophy of nature. I adopt a cluster-based approach to naturalism, on which positions are more or less naturalistic depending how many strands of the cluster naturalism they exemplify. I focus on two strands: belief that philosophy is continuous with the empirical sciences, and disbelief in supernatural entities. I argue that Hegel regards philosophy of nature as distinct, but not wholly discontinuous, from empirical science and that he believes in the reality of formal and final causes insofar as he is a realist about universal forms that interconnect to comprise a self-organizing whole. Nonetheless, for Hegel, natural particulars never fully realize these universal forms, so that empirical inquiry into these particulars and their efficient-causal interactions is always necessary. In these two respects, I conclude, Hegel's position sits in the middle of the naturalism/anti-naturalism spectrum.",
author = "Alison Stone",
year = "2013",
month = may,
doi = "10.1017/hgl.2013.2",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "59--78",
journal = "Hegel Bulletin",
issn = "2051-5367",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Hegel, Naturalism and the Philosophy of Nature

AU - Stone, Alison

PY - 2013/5

Y1 - 2013/5

N2 - In this article I consider whether Hegel is a naturalist or an anti-naturalist with respect to his philosophy of nature. I adopt a cluster-based approach to naturalism, on which positions are more or less naturalistic depending how many strands of the cluster naturalism they exemplify. I focus on two strands: belief that philosophy is continuous with the empirical sciences, and disbelief in supernatural entities. I argue that Hegel regards philosophy of nature as distinct, but not wholly discontinuous, from empirical science and that he believes in the reality of formal and final causes insofar as he is a realist about universal forms that interconnect to comprise a self-organizing whole. Nonetheless, for Hegel, natural particulars never fully realize these universal forms, so that empirical inquiry into these particulars and their efficient-causal interactions is always necessary. In these two respects, I conclude, Hegel's position sits in the middle of the naturalism/anti-naturalism spectrum.

AB - In this article I consider whether Hegel is a naturalist or an anti-naturalist with respect to his philosophy of nature. I adopt a cluster-based approach to naturalism, on which positions are more or less naturalistic depending how many strands of the cluster naturalism they exemplify. I focus on two strands: belief that philosophy is continuous with the empirical sciences, and disbelief in supernatural entities. I argue that Hegel regards philosophy of nature as distinct, but not wholly discontinuous, from empirical science and that he believes in the reality of formal and final causes insofar as he is a realist about universal forms that interconnect to comprise a self-organizing whole. Nonetheless, for Hegel, natural particulars never fully realize these universal forms, so that empirical inquiry into these particulars and their efficient-causal interactions is always necessary. In these two respects, I conclude, Hegel's position sits in the middle of the naturalism/anti-naturalism spectrum.

U2 - 10.1017/hgl.2013.2

DO - 10.1017/hgl.2013.2

M3 - Journal article

VL - 34

SP - 59

EP - 78

JO - Hegel Bulletin

JF - Hegel Bulletin

SN - 2051-5367

IS - 1

ER -