Home > Research > Publications & Outputs > Heidegger’s claim

Research

Associated organisational units

Electronic data

  • 2016 Schmitt

    Rights statement: This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal for Cultural Research on 10/11/2015, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14797585.2016.1141834

    Accepted author manuscript, 142 KB, PDF document

    Available under license: CC BY-NC

Links

Text available via DOI:

Keywords

View graph of relations

Heidegger’s claim: “Carl Schmitt thinks as a Liberal”

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Published

Standard

Heidegger’s claim: “Carl Schmitt thinks as a Liberal”. / Hemming, Laurence Paul.
In: Journal for Cultural Research, Vol. 20, No. 3, 12.2016, p. 286-294.

Research output: Contribution to Journal/Magazine › Journal article › peer-review

Harvard

Hemming, LP 2016, 'Heidegger’s claim: “Carl Schmitt thinks as a Liberal”', Journal for Cultural Research, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 286-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2016.1141834

APA

Hemming, L. P. (2016). Heidegger’s claim: “Carl Schmitt thinks as a Liberal”. Journal for Cultural Research, 20(3), 286-294. https://doi.org/10.1080/14797585.2016.1141834

Vancouver

Hemming LP. Heidegger’s claim: “Carl Schmitt thinks as a Liberal”. Journal for Cultural Research. 2016 Dec;20(3):286-294. Epub 2016 Feb 17. doi: 10.1080/14797585.2016.1141834

Author

Hemming, Laurence Paul. / Heidegger’s claim : “Carl Schmitt thinks as a Liberal”. In: Journal for Cultural Research. 2016 ; Vol. 20, No. 3. pp. 286-294.

Bibtex

@article{4fe690bc896f41c2b28211ec8b1021a8,
title = "Heidegger{\textquoteright}s claim: “Carl Schmitt thinks as a Liberal”",
abstract = "This paper examines Heidegger{\textquoteright}s critique of Carl Schmitt during the Nazi period,focusing on Heidegger{\textquoteright}s notes for seminars on Hegel{\textquoteright}s Philosophy of Right. Takingup Heidegger{\textquoteright}s and Schmitt{\textquoteright}s critique of Hegel, Heidegger argues that the friend/enemydistinction Schmitt makes is still grounded in a humanistic liberalism, and soin the very Hegelian subjectivity that Schmitt claims to reject. Heidegger then turnsto the question of dikē, and shows how there is a more originary grounding for thepolis and the state in a concept Heidegger develops from his analysis of Anaximander.Grounding this is the question which concerns which God (or which goddess)grounds any past, present, or future “political theology”.",
keywords = "Schmitt, Heidegger, liberalism, Hegel, philosophy of right, political theology",
author = "Hemming, {Laurence Paul}",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal for Cultural Research on 10/11/2015, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14797585.2016.1141834",
year = "2016",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1080/14797585.2016.1141834",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "286--294",
journal = "Journal for Cultural Research",
issn = "1479-7585",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Heidegger’s claim

T2 - “Carl Schmitt thinks as a Liberal”

AU - Hemming, Laurence Paul

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal for Cultural Research on 10/11/2015, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14797585.2016.1141834

PY - 2016/12

Y1 - 2016/12

N2 - This paper examines Heidegger’s critique of Carl Schmitt during the Nazi period,focusing on Heidegger’s notes for seminars on Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Takingup Heidegger’s and Schmitt’s critique of Hegel, Heidegger argues that the friend/enemydistinction Schmitt makes is still grounded in a humanistic liberalism, and soin the very Hegelian subjectivity that Schmitt claims to reject. Heidegger then turnsto the question of dikē, and shows how there is a more originary grounding for thepolis and the state in a concept Heidegger develops from his analysis of Anaximander.Grounding this is the question which concerns which God (or which goddess)grounds any past, present, or future “political theology”.

AB - This paper examines Heidegger’s critique of Carl Schmitt during the Nazi period,focusing on Heidegger’s notes for seminars on Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Takingup Heidegger’s and Schmitt’s critique of Hegel, Heidegger argues that the friend/enemydistinction Schmitt makes is still grounded in a humanistic liberalism, and soin the very Hegelian subjectivity that Schmitt claims to reject. Heidegger then turnsto the question of dikē, and shows how there is a more originary grounding for thepolis and the state in a concept Heidegger develops from his analysis of Anaximander.Grounding this is the question which concerns which God (or which goddess)grounds any past, present, or future “political theology”.

KW - Schmitt

KW - Heidegger

KW - liberalism

KW - Hegel

KW - philosophy of right

KW - political theology

U2 - 10.1080/14797585.2016.1141834

DO - 10.1080/14797585.2016.1141834

M3 - Journal article

VL - 20

SP - 286

EP - 294

JO - Journal for Cultural Research

JF - Journal for Cultural Research

SN - 1479-7585

IS - 3

ER -